TERMN-8R 6 band radio

[DaveInDenver]

I mentioned that Jim, but the problem is that is for a different radio granted in 2014 and type acceptance is not transferable. So it's technically not within the rules. But truth is I think the only thing the FCC is really worried about is that the application fee is paid in full. Some of the labs that Anytone has used aren't FCC approved AFAIK and they still granted them.

 

[JimBiram]

Strange...this is the label according to the FCC application but it shows an entirely different FCC ID as the Radio shows https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2550856



Every Day is a Good Day Surfing...Some are just Better Than Others

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[DaveInDenver]

I may have been the only one, but the link didn't work for me. I think this is the PDF of the label in your link.

View attachment 2550856.pdf

 

[JimBiram]

Try this...https://www.dropbox.com/s/8u23n09vfc6t97k/getapplicationattachment.pdf?dl=0


Every Day is a Good Day Surfing...Some are just Better Than Others

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Tennmogger]

Many of us have that same burr. The burr is a continued loosening of specs for cheap radios in exchange for certification fees. All about the $$$. The result will be poor performance which the owner simply lives with in exchange for a cheap price. But reduced performance specs also effect all other radio users because a transmitter with poor specs pollutes the bands every time it's keyed. With the FCC proposing further significant reduction in policing and regulation of the bands, including Amateur freqs, it's obvious they don't care.

Bob