LIVEABOARD
Adventurer
trying to decide need pros/cons on which to get THX
My friend just received his new ARB fridge. I have an Engel MT 45. The ARBs use a Danfos compressor which consume more electricity. The Engels use a swing motor which is more efficient to run. I really liked the interior basket , trick light on the inside, and the low volt shut off features of the ARB. I like simplistic designs, touch panels ware out to fast for me.. All in all both are good it is just about your preferences.
Im not sure where you get your performance figures from ,but 4WD Action in oz has just done another fridge comparo in issue 136 after the last one 4-5 years ago.
There were 7 brands with Engel MT45F being the smallest at 41 litres.
The ARB was the 3rd biggest at 47 litres
The Engel won the cold climate test in an ambient tent of 17c(63F) using 5.20A over 24 hrs and the ARB using 8.52A/24hrs
However the larger ARB did well in the hot climate test of 37c (100F) using 38.97A/24hrs,while the Engel used 45.25A/24hrs.
The Waeco 50 beat both of them in both tests:victory:
3.95A/24hrs at 17c and 38.33A/24hrs 37c
The other benefit to the Danfos compressor is that it widely used through out the world in at least 5 brands of car fridge.
I understand the Sarafuiji swing motor uses less power at start up which is useful when power supply is limited.
The Bushman won the overall title of Best Value for Money fridge.
There wasnt much difference between 1st and last.
Some of the brands have 2-3 models in one size but only one from each brand was tested.
I would have liked them to have tested the Marine Engel
You forgot to mention that 4WD Action gave the new ARB the winning marks
I missed that somehow:sombrero: It should have been included at the end with the score sheet.
I missed it the first run through too. I though they had given the Bushman the overall pick but as I read deeper it was the ARB
Its a bit strange really,they sort of have 2 x 1st places.
Do you want the best fridge or the best value fridge??
Overland Journal summarizes their reviews in the same manner. They always pick some grossly expensive item as overall best (such as a $700 duffle bag), then for the rest of us pick something decent as "best value".
While I appreciate knowing that there are enough people in the world spending $700 on a simple bag to keep a company in business, reviews of that sort really have no value to me. I greatly appreciate the more practical options.
The cynics amongst us might conclude that the "overall best " in some cases should have been the "biggest advertising revenue provider".:coffeedrink:
I have an enormous respect for the experience, knowledge, skill, and talents of JH, but I am so physicaly and financially different from him as to render most of his reviews merely as entertainment rather than of practical value.