HI nwoods,
That you disagree is not the point. The issue is you bothered to read what is probably the most influential book and philosophy in our times. Can't you see this? Not meaning disrespect, I would have a very hard time taking your word over Darwin's. There was much that Darwin admitted he did not understand. For example, the whole concept of genetics was still far in the future. He did not know how evolution happened genetically, only that his observations suggested that it did. And the world of science agrees but there are still mysteries to be solved.
Origin Of The Species is a book that any modern person with a hint of curiosity MUST read and draw conclusions as you did. I have no problem with your opinions (that's all they are). I have a big problem with those who ignore the issue.
Sparky
That you disagree is not the point. The issue is you bothered to read what is probably the most influential book and philosophy in our times. Can't you see this? Not meaning disrespect, I would have a very hard time taking your word over Darwin's. There was much that Darwin admitted he did not understand. For example, the whole concept of genetics was still far in the future. He did not know how evolution happened genetically, only that his observations suggested that it did. And the world of science agrees but there are still mysteries to be solved.
Origin Of The Species is a book that any modern person with a hint of curiosity MUST read and draw conclusions as you did. I have no problem with your opinions (that's all they are). I have a big problem with those who ignore the issue.
Sparky
Last edited: