Thread: Audi allroad: Perfect Choice?

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Audi allroad: Perfect Choice?

    Tell me why an Audi allroad isnt the best choice for my planned 12-15k mile North American tour this May. I am not as interested in "muddin'" and recreational "rock crawlin'", but nearly 2,500 miles of the planned route are completely off-pavement (forest srvc., logging roads in ME, trans-Labrador, parts of Mexico etc.)

    1. Sleeps 2 in back
    2. 250 hp
    3. Adjustable ride height that offers more ground clearance than a Grand Cherokee or stock Disco in level 4.
    4. Yoko Geolanders fit perfectly
    5. 20 mpg
    6. Quiet enough to have a conversation at 100 mph.
    7. Quattro (no true low range)
    8. plenty of room for a good roof basket and roof mounted full size spare

    I mean what am i missing? I own a Series IIa and put 50k miles on an FJ62, but why not choose a quattro platform that uses less gas, cruises better, and has real off-road capability? When will i wish i had a 4 runner with lockers and a snorkel?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Prescott, AZ
    Posts
    12,904
    I have always liked that car. Would be a fun machine for many trips.
    Scott Brady
    Overland Journal
    D1 | LJ78 | LR4 | MKIII | J8 | G-Wagen |

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,564
    If that is the type of thing you're looking for, I'd strongly suggest a Subaru Forester instead. It has many of the same attributes, but likely more room, and more reliable. Somebody on this site detailed a trip they took on logging roads with a bunch of trucks, as proof-of-concept.

  4. #4
    terrible choice. the airbag suspension WILL fail/leak/collapse
    the 2.7T is underpowered for the weight and the 4.2 is a gas hog. There are trans issues, turbo issues, tb, etc etc etc

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Marquette, MI and Jacskon, WY
    Posts
    3,018
    The biggest issue with a Forrester is the lack of length in the back to sleep. A Legacy Outback would be a better option. I am not an expert on Allroads but I do know people that own them who have had expensive issues related to the airbag system used for the front and rear suspensions. That said though, the A6 avant that it is based on is a fantastic vehicle. I have toured on unrestricted autobahn and cruised comfortably at 150mph, rock solid. The twin turbo V 10 RS6 avant is a story for another time. It is my all around favorite car that I have driven, simply amazing.
    Kristian Saile
    Upper Peninsula Overland
    http://upoverland.org/index.php

    Blog
    Life on the Road

    VW Type 181 (Thing)
    Porsche 944
    Landcruiser FJ60
    Landcruiser FJ80
    Subaru WRX STI

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,210
    MMMM.....Allroad. Boy do I miss that car. Don't miss the horrible gas mileage though...or the TPMS system that never worked. BUT we almost re-purchased one two years ago when we ended up with the FJ instead. The airbag system was great, TONS of room (Forester with more room? No way!) and it was fun to drive.

    I think it would be just fine on any forest/fire road and maybe even a little worse roadage in the highest suspension setting. Personally, I'd go for it...it is the UBERwagen!!
    Heidi - KF7CKI
    Sierra Expeditions
    1998 4Runner SR5

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    44

    Default Allroad

    I have had an Allroad for nearly 6 years (75K miles). No problems whatsoever with turbo, transmission, suspension, etc.---everything has worked perfectly. Average MPG for the life of the car has been 22mpg. Car is driven over dirt roads in and out of my property in eastern Oregon, in the snow, dirt, mud and cross country at ticket-worthy speeds in every western state. Best, most versatile every-day use car I have owned.
    I also have a '09 expedition built Tacoma with Icon / ARB suspension upgrades, skid plates, front/rear bumpers, rtt, etc. The two are VERY different beasts, indeed. For the occasional dirt road and use on the highway, you can't beat the Audi. Just remember, Allroad focus, not off-road focus. Just my two cents.

  8. #8
    Love the All-Road - but for the money it's hard to imagine what you would get into that an Outback wouldn't handle just as well - with plenty of extra cash in your pocket.

    That being said - vehicles are an emotional purchase. We all like to pretend that we are making solid decisions based on thorough cost-benefit analysis procedures, but if that were the case most of us would be driving Ford Escort wagons.

    Truth is, some people gravitate towards different cars for different reasons, some people park a car and walk way, some people park a car, walk a few steps and then turn around to look at it. I'll admit to being in the latter group. If you've got the cash I can't think of any reason not to go in an Allroad - if I had the cash I would.
    '96 4runner LTD - Family expedition rig
    Brother Switchblade of Courteous Acceptance
    The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

  9. #9
    allroads are cool looking. I love Audi's and will probably always have one but will never buy the allroad. It is plagued w/ issues, expensive ones.
    It takes a serious commitment to own one.

    Realistically, the 4Runner will be much faster, tougher, cheaper, far more reliable and get comparable mpg's - if not better- than the allroad.

    *-
    and don't get me wrong, the allroad is a beautiful car. That's why I considered it. It is simply way too expensive to upkeep and unreliable.
    If you do want to buy, get the 4.2 - more power for the heavy AR, generally more reliable and nearly the same mpg's.
    2.7T only if it's tied to the 6spd manual.
    Last edited by Life_in_4Lo; 03-02-2010 at 09:45 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •