and the California question??
and the California question??
Cristian Larrondo
2001 D2 OME springs, SD Rack, CDL, D1 Front bumper.
1974 Series III
Can't wait to follow the progress.
I see you are in LA, how do you plan on getting it to pass smog or the referee station? I still haven't taken my BMW E30 with M3 transplant to the referee station b/c I am scared of all the regulations and that is still gas with all smog equipment intact.
2001 Range Rover 4.6L SE (SD rack, ladder, Warn xd9000ce, steering guard, axle guard, diff guard, sliders, coils, 33in KM2s... no chrome)
2003 4Runner 4.7L V8 (wife's)
1985 E30S52 (1985 318i w/ 1998 M3 drivetrain, OBDI and 5-lug conversion)
Far better it is to dare mighty things...even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those timid spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat. - theodore roosevelt
I know that California is a lot stricter but all in all, EPA says that. Its a medium duty diesel available in a vehicle of the same, or newer, vehicle and same weight class, so you should be okay. I would check with your DEQ first though as I know that the CARB does EPA+ type rules and regs.
"You did it yourself because you had to. And sometimes life still requires of us that we take up the slack and drive like we know where we’re going—there will be time for looking at the map when you’re lost."
today it was time to unwrap the 6.2. it was clear that gm flywheel was much larger. and that means the bell housing from the zf 22 wont work without major mods, no problemo at allas far as the engine the size of the 6.2 is very much the same as 3.9
Eric
Couldn't you just use the smaller gm flex plate on it?
"My fellow Americans, I am pleased to tell you I just signed legislation which outlaws Russia forever. The bombing begins in five minutes."
Ronald Reagan
1983 Defender 110
i could use that but then what do i do with the huge starter? and larger flywheel is also good for the diesel during cranking as a leverage for the starter.
and even if i use smaller flywheel i still had to change the entire bolt pattern on the zf22 trans. as u see from the pics the back section of the 6.2 is completely deferent than rover v8
Last edited by REDROVER; 03-19-2011 at 04:48 AM.
Awesome! Can't wait to see how you get on, I'm very tempted by the 6.2!
I'm sure you've considered this....but what is the design limit for torque input on the ZF trans, and how does that compare with the NA 6.2?
Inquiring minds....![]()
Don't worry, you're biodegradable.