Page 16 of 22 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast

Thread: Smittybuilt Element Ramps

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Swansboro, California
    Posts
    217
    Anyone done any long term tests on these? Mean to say carrying them and using them to get unstuck/over stuff? I question the usefulness of this kind of product regardless of quality. I just don't run into a "man if I could have jut cleared that 3ft of soft stuff I would have made it" situation very often. From the vids and such I have seen it looks like they are used a shovel more than anything...
    The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. - Marcel Proust

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5
    Any other first hand experiences with these since the comparison test was done a year ago? Other than the comparison to MT's posted here, there are no reviews out there that i can find.

  3. #153
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Brady View Post
    I disagree on all accounts. Smittybuilt did a blatant copy/ reverse engineering and is only cheaper because they have no overhead associated with innovation, design or testing.

    I will never buy a blatant knock-off. It is bad for the industry, bad for innovation and usually ends up failing miserably in the field. I have no intention of rewarding the copy-cats.

    In particular, I have found your statement of "well-proven in the field" to be entirely false when it comes to Smittybuilt products, their winches in particular.
    I agree 100% with Mr. Brady here. I have seen smittybuilt and others rip off too many designs from people that put in all the hard work and time required to make sure the product functions as intended. I will do my level best to never knowingly buy from these "copycat" companies.
    2004 Dodge Ram 2500 CTD Long Bed 4x4- Soon to be an Expo Rig.
    Project Land Mass
    Heiser Oil Motorsports
    Friends of San Bernardino National Forest

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    People's Republik of Cambridge
    Posts
    290
    FWIW, I played with a set of SBs about a month ago; in northeast mud. As much as everyone in the crew winced when they were pulled out of the truck, they did behave well--surprisingly well. We did not compare against MT that event, only the SB, so it was not a science fair comparison--we were just out having fun.

    That said, I have played with MT previously, but in sand only. Sure the SB made noise when deflected, but showed no signs of failure or deformation. IMO, they worked fine for both mud traction and, when doubled up, for short span bridging. Only fail ws some of the little nipples that seared of with tire spin. One of the guys in the crew has a ton of experince with MT and was impressed with the SB, for the price point--but was also very loyal to MT being the innovator not a copy cat. Would I buy a set...maybe for the landy in Costa Rica.
    Toltec Rally Team
    www.toltecrally.com: What would Steve Zissou do?
    '02 WRX Super Production Class Rally Car: now wikked fastah
    '99 UZJ100: Our well armored grocery getter
    '76 Diesel Series III 88: trying to become a US citizen
    '94 FZJ80: Betty is now officially Tica
    '95 RRC LWB: our new project/problem child

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Roosevelt, NJ
    Posts
    8
    One could argue that Smittybuilt is innovative because they understand the market place better and can come up with lower cost alternatives to otherwise not affordable products. I've looked at maxtrax, but after finding out how much they cost, I bagged out on them. Not really a must have for my needs, but i nice to have. If Maxtrax wanted to continue to innovate they could come out with a lower cost product for people like me who just don't need the extreme of what they offer. Patents don't last forever. You can't just innovate once, then call it a day. If you want to succeed in a competitive marketplace you have to continue to innovate. Look at companies like Teraflex, started out with lift kits, now they have sliders, carriers, bumpers etc. You can also tell they have a lot of technology in their designs making them harder to copy and offering the customer better benefits.

    If you wanted to you could probably make a maxtrax design that was even better then theirs in some way, like specially designing it to fit somewhere smart in a jeep, toyota, etc. You could make one that breaks in half making it easier to store and you could get away with buying one instead of 2 and use it on both tires in a pinch n the beach. I could go on and on. Point is Smittybuilt saw an opportunity, or some would say a gap in the marketplace, that was not being filled by Maxtrax and took advantage of it. This is the way business works. I am for supporting the small guy, but if it makes no sense to do so, forget about it.

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    People's Republik of Cambridge
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by horrocks007 View Post
    One could argue that Smittybuilt is innovative because they understand the market place better and can come up with lower cost alternatives to otherwise not affordable products
    And that would be an inaccurate argument.

    Innovation has to bring with it new functional benefit that is independent of economics. A cheaper steel winch cable is not innovative, synthetic winch cable is.

    In comparing Maxtrax vs Smittybuilt, one could make the case that Maxtrax innovated (via injection moulding) a new version of a sand ladder. (I say "make a case" because someone else could have put to market an injection molded sand/mud traction device before Maxtrax but few know/knew of them) Smittybuilt, albeit a decent product, didn't innovate anything; they simply copied Maxtrax idea, had it made in the far east, and is selling at a lower price point. Economically competitive yes, innovative no... I've used both, only difference I could tell were price and color.
    Toltec Rally Team
    www.toltecrally.com: What would Steve Zissou do?
    '02 WRX Super Production Class Rally Car: now wikked fastah
    '99 UZJ100: Our well armored grocery getter
    '76 Diesel Series III 88: trying to become a US citizen
    '94 FZJ80: Betty is now officially Tica
    '95 RRC LWB: our new project/problem child

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Roosevelt, NJ
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by REDrum View Post
    And that would be an inaccurate argument.

    Innovation has to bring with it new functional benefit that is independent of economics. A cheaper steel winch cable is not innovative, synthetic winch cable is.

    Innovation comes in many forms and very very very often it comes in the form of economics. I understand this product is a copy cat. But in business true innovation must be something that is accessible by people.
    Last edited by horrocks007; 02-24-2013 at 02:55 AM.

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    People's Republik of Cambridge
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by horrocks007 View Post
    Innovation comes in many forms and very very very often it comes in the form of economics. I understand this product is a copy cat. But in business true innovation must be something that is accessible by people.
    Ummm....Never mind.....not worth key strokes....
    Toltec Rally Team
    www.toltecrally.com: What would Steve Zissou do?
    '02 WRX Super Production Class Rally Car: now wikked fastah
    '99 UZJ100: Our well armored grocery getter
    '76 Diesel Series III 88: trying to become a US citizen
    '94 FZJ80: Betty is now officially Tica
    '95 RRC LWB: our new project/problem child

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Orange County, California
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by horrocks007 View Post
    Innovation comes in many forms and very very very often it comes in the form of economics. I understand this product is a copy cat. But in business true innovation must be something that is accessible by people.
    Yeah... You're not getting it. Stealing a design will AlWAYS be cheaper to market. You are making it harder for the innovators to stay in business and the next product they may have developed may have been a "must have" for you but if they can't compete with those who steal their ideas then they may not be around to develop it. Do what's right and don't be cheap. You can justify all you want but stealing ideas is still stealing.
    My Dream Machine (took a year to find): 2007 Classic Chevy 2500HD WT, 4WD, Extended Cab, Short Bed, LBZ Duramax

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    4,247
    Sure, that's nice and all but both models are incredibly overpriced for what they are.... pieces of plastic.
    Scott Brown- Overland Guide and Photographer
    1995 Montero SR--1987 4Runner(sold)--
    1997 Honda XR650L--1988 FJ62 Landcruiser (project)
    "You have to remain a bit naive, a bit risky, a bit crazy if you want to experience a real adventure. You have to push the limits."


Page 16 of 22 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •