Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread: Electric Cooling Fans

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    4,252

    Default Electric Cooling Fans

    What are the thoughts of removing the belt driven fan and putting in an electric fan. I'm thinking, although I'm no mechanic, that less resistance on the engine... better performance and mileage?
    The one for the Xterra Fan
    For expedition purposes. Would electric be reliable? Especially with dust and water.

    What would you guys suggest?

    Gracias,
    Scott

    EDIT:
    I found this on Autozone website.... seems to pull more air through, at the same amperage... and cheaper...

    About this product:
    • Adjustable 180-240 deg. fahrenheit thermostat
    • Pulls up to 2,800 cfm of air, cooling vehicles with up to 250 or more horsepower (without air) and 220 or more horse power (with air)
    • 14 AMP draw
    Your stock fan robs your engine of up to 15 or more horsepower! Replace it with a rugged, universal-fit fan equipped with an adjustable 180 - 240 deg. fahrenheit thermostat. Bolts to your radiator supports using sturdy brackets. With a heavy-duty motor, highly angled blades, and 15" diameter, this unit pulls up to 2,800 cfm of air, cooling vehicles with up to 250 + HP (without air) and 220 + HP (with air). Overall: 18" x 16-1/8" x 4". Amp draw, 14 amps. Part Number:67017Weight:14.3 lbs.
    Last edited by LaOutbackTrail; 06-09-2007 at 01:54 AM.
    Scott Brown- Overland Guide and Photographer
    1995 Montero SR--1987 4Runner(sold)--
    1997 Honda XR650L--1988 FJ62 Landcruiser (project)
    "You have to remain a bit naive, a bit risky, a bit crazy if you want to experience a real adventure. You have to push the limits."


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,773
    It will help but Alternators do put drag on engines and it does increase with amperage draw.

    Keep a close eye on the fan. I have heard some aftermarket fans are definitely not the quality of OEM.

    You might be better off hitting a junkyard and pulling a fan off something like a Taurus.

    http://tacomaterritory.com/wiki/inde...s_Electric_Fan

    http://www.google.com/search?q=for+t...e7&rlz=1I7GGLD

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,555
    I think OEM fans are superior to most of the aftermarket. I would suggest dual fans. Redundancy is a good thing.

    Here is my install- LS1 Fan conversion

    They offer better cooling at crawl speeds. Control over engagement temperature. Cancellation during water crossings.
    Mine have been a very good modification.
    Plan on adding a bigger alternator to match the increased electrical load.
    "Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-mechanic from Mad Max-
    If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
    - BLT Offroad KE7CSK

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    4,252
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryJ
    I think OEM fans are superior to most of the aftermarket. I would suggest dual fans. Redundancy is a good thing.

    Here is my install- LS1 Fan conversion

    They offer better cooling at crawl speeds. Control over engagement temperature. Cancellation during water crossings.
    Mine have been a very good modification.
    Plan on adding a bigger alternator to match the increased electrical load.
    Thanks for the replies. Questions.

    Increased electrical load? I know the fan is pulling 14 more amps..... but, is the larger alternator necessary if few other electronics are being used?

    I do have 4 roof mounted offroad lights, but frequency of use hardley warrants them being on the roof causing so much extra drag.

    questions... questions....
    Scott Brown- Overland Guide and Photographer
    1995 Montero SR--1987 4Runner(sold)--
    1997 Honda XR650L--1988 FJ62 Landcruiser (project)
    "You have to remain a bit naive, a bit risky, a bit crazy if you want to experience a real adventure. You have to push the limits."


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prescott Valley,AZ
    Posts
    1,388
    I removed the stock fan on my Tacoma, worked fine when the air speed through the radiator was good. As long as I was on the road I had no problems. Replaced the belt driven fan with the largest electric one I could find, got real hot off road every time. Then I added an additional electric fan...Still got too hot! The wire insulation was melting and dripping off onto the ground! I went back to the factory set up and have had no cooling problems since doing so.

    Stay with what the factory engineers have designed for you!

    REX
    2001 Toyota Tacoma eXtracab 1994 Six Pac Flip-Pac
    Old Man Emu suspension ARB bumper 33/10.50/15 Mud Terrain BFGs BudBuilt Skid plate
    Marlin Crawler 4.7-1 tacobox 4.88s member #1455
    1980 Honda CM400T
    1982 Honda GL1100 'Naked' Goldwing
    Go Someplace.....Do Something It's only far away if you never leave!

  6. #6
    Air flow is what is needed to cool an engine in a water to air cooler (radiator) of a given surface area and heat rejection capability. This air flow has a weight (in pounds or kilograms) and must be flowed by whatever method you choose. A common vehicle like a Dodge 4.7L v8 draws roughly 7500cfm of air at peak cooling temps to prevent overheating. This draws approximately 9.6hp from the engine. An electric fan would have to move the same amount of air. There is no "effeciency" gain for being electric over mechanical, so the same amount of power would be drawn from the electric motor. How many electric fans do you see that have a 10hp motor on them? (just kidding-you will not find any)

    In simple terms, an electric fan MAY (not will) boost the airflow of an existing cooling system with a mechanical fan, but they are marginal at best for street driven vehicles without a mechanical fan. Electric fans have no business on an off highway vehicle by themselves.

    Best regards,

    Bob Sheaves
    CEO
    catNET Incorporated
    http://www.catnetsolutions.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    4,252
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob_Sheaves
    In simple terms, an electric fan MAY (not will) boost the airflow of an existing cooling system with a mechanical fan, but they are marginal at best for street driven vehicles without a mechanical fan. Electric fans have no business on an off highway vehicle by themselves.

    Best regards,

    Bob Sheaves
    CEO
    catNET Incorporated
    http://www.catnetsolutions.com
    Thanks... i'll put the electric fan idea in the "thought about" drawer....
    Scott Brown- Overland Guide and Photographer
    1995 Montero SR--1987 4Runner(sold)--
    1997 Honda XR650L--1988 FJ62 Landcruiser (project)
    "You have to remain a bit naive, a bit risky, a bit crazy if you want to experience a real adventure. You have to push the limits."


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,555
    While the stock clutch fan may exceed the CFM available from an electric at higher engine speeds, electric fans really shine at lower speeds.
    I am unable to get a consistent rating for either the stock or electrics in my case. The stock fan pulls in excess of 4000 cfm. The dual electric fans 3800 cfm. At idles speeds they pull as much as the stock fan does in the higher rpms. It does cool much better than stock. The AC works better, the engine stays cooler.

    Anytime you add a load to the electrical system you should also consider the systems affected. My vehicle has a CS130D alternator that is rated at 100 amps. As with the cfm rating for fans, that is maximum, not idle speed where I need that power. At idle speeds it would produce just over 50 amps. The 14 amp load I added is over 20% of that capacity. With all the accessories on it was more than was available and there was a voltage drop. Voltage drop for the fans means lower speeds and less air.
    Another problem from over taxing the alternator is the heat that is generated and the associated decrease in lifespan. Neither are desirable.

    Airflow is not the only part of the puzzle. In my case the reservoir of coolant and the surface area of the radiator were insufficient for a hotter climate. I increased the radiator size and capacity. Next the stock temperature range was just too close to the edge of hot. I installed a lower temperature theromostat. Now you must match the engagement point for the clutch fan. The stock clutch fan engages way too late in my opinion. There were no lower temperature clutches available, and eliminating it is not a good idea to maintain performance and mileage. Electrics are easily adjustable.
    Maintaining fan speed and voltage by adding a bigger alternator was the last piece. It has been working well for me.

    Pros, and Cons.
    The stock fan is pretty hard to beat. It moves lots of air. It is simple. The clutch is performance friendly and really does a good job. It is simple and virtually break proof. The stock mechanical fan is a very good set-up.
    It is not adjustable. It may not pull enough air at low engine speeds. It can be very loud when the clutch is locked.

    Electrics are nice. Faster warm ups. In the wintertime they rarely turn on around here. Adjustability. Better airflow for the AC when idling. Manual override. They are not turning all the time requiring engine horsepower. There may be some performance and mileage increases. (the stock clutch fan does a good job, increases may be minimal at best)

    Would I do it again? Yes. If a lower temperature clutch had been available would I have done that? Perhaps, but the benefits of the electrics would likely have drawn me that direction eventually.

    Each application is different. Install it right and consider all the things it will effect. Do it right using properly sized fan, wire , fuses, relays, thermostatic controls, etc.
    The majority of vehicles on the road are using electric fans. They are dependable and durable. They do have a place in an offroad vehicle.
    Last edited by HenryJ; 06-09-2007 at 01:36 PM.
    "Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-mechanic from Mad Max-
    If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
    - BLT Offroad KE7CSK

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by HenryJ
    While the stock clutch fan may exceed the CFM available from an electric at higher engine speeds, electric fans really shine at lower speeds.
    I am unable to get a consistent rating for either the stock or electrics in my case. The stock fan pulls in excess of 4000 cfm. The dual electric fans 3800 cfm. At idles speeds they pull as much as the stock fan does in the higher rpms. It does cool much better than stock. The AC works better, the engine stays cooler.

    Anytime you add a load to the electrical system you should also consider the systems affected. My vehicle has a CS130D alternator that is rated at 100 amps. As with the cfm rating for fans, that is maximum, not idle speed where I need that power. At idle speeds it would produce just over 50 amps. The 14 amp load I added is over 20% of that capacity. With all the accessories on it was more than was available and there was a voltage drop. Voltage drop for the fans means lower speeds and less air.
    Another problem from over taxing the alternator is the heat that is generated and the associated decrease in lifespan. Neither are desirable.

    Airflow is not the only part of the puzzle. In my case the reservoir of coolant and the surface area of the radiator were insufficient for a hotter climate. I increased the radiator size and capacity. Next the stock temperature range was just too close to the edge of hot. I installed a lower temperature theromostat. Now you must match the engagement point for the clutch fan. The stock clutch fan engages way too late in my opinion. There were no lower temperature clutches available, and eliminating it is not a good idea to maintain performance and mileage. Electrics are easily adjustable.
    Maintaining fan speed and voltage by adding a bigger alternator was the last piece. It has been working well for me.

    Pros, and Cons.
    The stock fan is pretty hard to beat. It moves lots of air. It is simple. The clutch is performance friendly and really does a good job. It is simple and virtually break proof. The stock mechanical fan is a very good set-up.
    It is not adjustable. It may not pull enough air at low engine speeds. It can be very loud when the clutch is locked.

    Electrics are nice. Faster warm ups. In the wintertime they rarely turn on around here. Adjustability. Better airflow for the AC when idling. Manual override. They are not turning all the time requiring engine horsepower. There may be some performance and mileage increases. (the stock clutch fan does a good job, increases may be minimal at best)

    Would I do it again? Yes. If a lower temperature clutch had been available would I have done that? Perhaps, but the benefits of the electrics would likely have drawn me that direction eventually.

    Each application is different. Install it right and consider all the things it will effect. Do it right using properly sized fan, wire , fuses, relays, thermostatic controls, etc.
    The majority of vehicles on the road are using electric fans. They are dependable and durable. They do have a place in an offroad vehicle.
    Sorry, cooling is strictly a function of heat rejection thru the cooler. Period. All the other items you mention do not increase the cooling capacity-it merely postpones the inevitable failure under loading at peak power, which has nothing to do with engine speed or vehicle speed. Peak power is at 0.7 or above tractive effort, usually in the 10-11mph (or less) range in a vehicle moving in compound low range. There is good reason there are no electric fans used in military vehicles. Electric fans simply cannot do the job under peak loading.

    Best regards,

    Bob Sheaves
    CEO
    catNET Incorporated
    http://www.catnetsolutions.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    1,555
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob_Sheaves
    Sorry, cooling is strictly a function of heat rejection thru the cooler. Period. All the other items you mention do not increase the cooling capacity-it merely postpones the inevitable failure under loading at peak power, which has nothing to do with engine speed or vehicle speed.
    The size of the system must be such that it can meet the demands of the load applied. Heat is transfer to air. The removal of that heated air does effect cooling. Increased air flow does improve cooling.
    Electric fans can exceed the cfm of engine driven fans.
    This is not theory in my case. I tested and applied each step to a very functional system.

    I agree to disagree, Peace.
    "Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-mechanic from Mad Max-
    If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
    - BLT Offroad KE7CSK

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •