Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Thread: What Off Road Vehicle For Me?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Ketchum, ID
    Posts
    115
    I love my '85 FJ60. Built super stout, great character, lots of fun and very capable, but some of your requirements (like safety and highway comfort) make me steer you toward an 80 series or a Tacoma instead.

    A 4-door Taco with a shell would be a decent option; room for 4 and put a sleeping platform in the bed. Comfy highway, airbags, and plenty capable offroad.

    An FZJ80 would return a little lower fuel economy, but you're driving a street legal tank. Great protection, safety, good highway comfort, very good offroad performance, and plenty of gear-hauling capability. A solid-but-not-immaculate 80, plus the maintenance you'll likely want to do right off the bat like front axle/knuckle service, R&R the e-lockers, fluid change, etc. should fit in your price range pretty easily. Less pep than the Taco on-road, but that's a trade-off I'm more than willing to make (see the part about me loving my 60).

    Parts for the Cruiser will probably be more expensive than the Taco, but you shouldn't need to buy a ton of parts for either one. Both are very solid vehicles that will give you a few hundred thousand miles of good use. Neither are rocket science to work on, but if I had to pay a mechanic to do my wrenching for me I'd rather drop off a Tacoma than a Cruiser to get worked on. I'm comfortable turning my own wrenches, and with a FSM and the 'Mud boards, there's not much I'm not willing to tackle myself.

    Eric

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    915
    I know I may be chiming in a bit late, take a look at the Mitsubishi section and read up on the 2nd generation Monteros. I got my 95 for 1500 dollars. Ive spent in total around 3 grand and I have a vehicle capable of your entire list and then some. The SR trim comes with a factory air locker. Just ask any Aussie what vehicle they'd choose for an outback expo and they will tell you a "Pajero" which is what they are called down under. Considering that the Montero has "owned" the Dakar Rally since they started it, I'd say it speaks for itself. Just a humble suggestion. Personally, I wouldn't even consider anything else for an expedition vehicle. Maybe a LR Defender or a G Wagon, but I don't want to have to sell a kidney to get one. Just keep in mind I am just a bit biased.
    J.W.
    Build thread http://www.expeditionportal.com/foru...e-build-thread

    95 Monty LS with 33 10.50 KM2s, air locker, winch, snorkel, sliders, bottle opener, and stuff...-EMT,Auto Tech, US ARMY Survival and land navigation specialist, US ARMY VETERAN 1st CAV 1st BGD COLT Team 3

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    699
    Nothing fits your specifications. You need to decide what is most important to give up. Hint, that'll change as you age.
    2004 Dodge 2500 CTD 4WD FWC
    1960 Jeep CJ5
    KK6AUI
    Member CA4WDC, BRC, UFWDA, Tread Lightly
    "The welfare of the people has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience"
    - Albert Camus

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Visalia, CA
    Posts
    425
    Montero has my vote as well. My 96 is significantly better than my 87 Toyota pickup in every single way. The Montero is stock except for 33x10.5 BFG ATs and a HAM radio. The truck had OME leafs, shocks, and steering damper; an Aussie locker, and I regeared it to handle the 265/75-16s it had. It still wasn't as capable off road, was obviously much slower on road and had worse ride quality than the Monty. I'm not bashing the old Toyota here; I really did enjoy owning that one its just that the Monteros are (in my opinion) a much better choice for the kind of use this site is about. Aftermarket is little but you can get OME and Ironman suspension, ARB bumpers and you can regear with the ring and pinion from other models. They've got the Super Select transfer case which gives you an AWD option in addition to the normal transfer case options and there is an air locker available, like scrubber said. The front seats also fold flat by design so you could sleep up there. Luckily for used car buyers, they are not well known here in the US and are very cheap as a result.
    1999 4Runner Limited. Its green.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    590
    94-96 montero SR. has a factory rear locker with 9.5" ring gear that is reliable up to 37" tires. the front is also good to go for 37's open. it will fit 33's stock, 35's with a 2" body lift. the BL will allow a gas tank relocation for more ground clearance. worst mileage i got was 15 all in city with a/c on. best was all highway and partial a/c at 21.

    also, they have heated leather seats, a big sunroof, heated sideview mirrors, and a 3 way adjustable shock system. the auto trans has a power mode for pulling hills and towing, and a snow mode to lock out 1st gear.

    they are a very reliable, powerful, comfortable, easy on the wallet truck. worth a look id say.

    http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lac...585656085.html

    http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lgb...581044741.html

    http://ventura.craigslist.org/ctd/2588080052.html

    good luck in your endeavers!
    1994 Montero SR. 32/11.5 Build in progress

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Posts
    2
    You really should give Isuzu's a look. Rodeo or Trooper would work for most of what you need. Relatively safe, and very cheap. I can't think of anything comparable that you can get late model and with low miles for the price you can get an Isuzu.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    hell
    Posts
    74
    Range Rover p38

    1999-2002

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Cairns and FarNorthTropical Australia...Now in Northern Territory.
    Posts
    97

    Exclamation Not a Montero!!!!.......Think Jeep!

    Quote Originally Posted by scrubber3 View Post
    . Just ask any Aussie what vehicle they'd choose for an outback expo and they will tell you a "Pajero" which is what they are called down under. Considering that the Montero has "owned" the Dakar Rally since they started it, I'd say it speaks for itself. Just a humble suggestion. Personally, I wouldn't even consider anything else for an expedition vehicle. Maybe a LR Defender or a G Wagon, but I don't want to have to sell a kidney to get one. Just keep in mind I am just a bit biased.
    Aa hem... I'm IN Australia and the Montero/Pajero are NOT very highly regarded at all!!!!!.......apart from the joke that the Japanese called them "Pajero" here because they thought nobody spoke Spanish in Oz......that's why they are sold as "Montero"'s in Europe and the Americas. Actually "pajero" is formal Spanish for a "young colt", but in colloquial Spanish it equates to what Australians call "wanker" , both metaphorically and in actual real description. The vehicles that they ran in the Dakar were a fibreglass shell that looked like a Montero, but was in reality far removed from it.

    Anyway, the point is that they're NOT a good choice. Why?......cos front IFS torsion bar or coil is difficult and expensive to lift.....the I4 2.6 wears out VERY quickly and is underpowered, V6's SOHC 3.0L & DOHC 3.5L are all alloy don't like to overheat and are VERY expensive to work on and repair and buy parts for, especially the DOHC V6 3.5L.....the auto transmission is VERY expensive to repair......the electronic Transfer case is incredibly complex and expensive to fix......and so it goes on....

    I honestly think you're best off with a Jeep XJ Cherokee or what I have, a Jeep ZJ Grand Cherokee. The ZJ are a bit roomier, 4 coil instead of leaves at rear (handle/ride better, easier/simpler to lift), 4 wheel discs, ABS (a plus on road, not good off road -so I put an inline switch in the power lead out of main powerbox supplying power to ABS system), dual air bags, 4.0L I6 gives good torque and OK fuel consumption, is as long lasting and reliable as an anvil, 318/5.2L or 360/5.9L V8's are also good (but use a bit more fuel for more torque but really crowd the engine bay up!). ZJ Limiteds have ultra comfy 12 way power, heated leather seats, a good basic Electronic Vehicle Information Centre (that reads in about 10 languages!) that tells you compass heading, outside temp, instant fuel consumption, average fuel consumption, miles before empty, coolant+ washer+ oil levels,cental locking and door/trunk ajar warnings etc etc, extra 12V power outlets front and back. Good simple constant 4WD system (good for grip on all surfaces on road or off road without having to choose ahead!) that uses a variable viscous coupling in H and fully locked in L. Rear diff is LSD but can easily be swapped for an auto locker or ARB Air Locker - but you're best swapping to stronger or larger axles shafts (cheap to do - $320). Good sized 136A alternator and compuer controlled charging system that can be safely used with AGM batteries - a 75A/H AGM fits in battery tray.

    I had an XJ for about a year before I thought, ""Ummmm, good idea, but there's better".....so I got a ZJ!

    By keeping all your upgrades reasonable, e.g. a 2" lift, 31", tires you end up with a very capable expedition rig at very reasonable low cost.

    The Defender is also a good choice, but not a good vehicle to drive on roads and in traffic - too truck-like!, doesn't handle well, not much in way of safety equipment and not very comfortable.

    I've had a LR Discovery 2 3.9 V8 (expensive for parts and gear - and not a lot of it, and very fuel hungry!), a Range Rover P38a 4.6 HSE (ultra comfortable but uses way too much fuel!!!!, and way too complex and unable to be fixed except by RR specialists), a Jeep XJ 4.0L and my present LR Series 2A and Jeep ZJ and like my present two best out of those.
    Last edited by Doctor W; 09-12-2011 at 01:31 AM.
    Jeep ZJ Grand Cherokee Limited 4.0L, 2 1/2" Coil Lift; Dana 30, ARB Air Locker, RCV Alloy CV's; Dana Super 35 with Trac-Loc and mechanical locker; Quadra Trac 1; 245/75x16LT.Also 1968 Land Rover S2a 109" Hard Top 2 door ex-military with a GM 202 cid, full Roof Basket and ladder, bonnet + rear door spare tyres, 7.50x16LT, twin fuel tanks, 3 x batteries, 240V inverter, 80W Solar, 220 Amp alternator, 40 gal. Water. Rough country expedition self sufficient camper.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    San Leandro, CA
    Posts
    3
    XJ or ZJ or WJ are great options.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    915
    """Anyway, the point is that they're NOT a good choice. Why?......cos front IFS torsion bar or coil is difficult and expensive to lift.....the I4 2.6 wears out VERY quickly and is underpowered, V6's SOHC 3.0L & DOHC 3.5L are all alloy don't like to overheat and are VERY expensive to work on and repair and buy parts for, especially the DOHC V6 3.5L.....the auto transmission is VERY expensive to repair......the electronic Transfer case is incredibly complex and expensive to fix......and so it goes on...."""


    Okay, I knew a flamer would start up.. BOOOOOO!!!!!

    Anyway I did say 2nd generation Montero which does not have an electronic transfer case. Most expo vehicles aren't lifted all that much and with a simple torsion bar crank you can get 2 inches or more which will allow most to get 35 inch tires under them. I don't think this guy is looking to crush cars or anything. Rear has coil springs. I know many 3.0 and 3.5 engines with well over 200,000 miles on them. I personally don't know of any engine that likes to overheat. The transmissions are nearly bulletproof and Ive never heard of a cheap transmission job. Not trying to bash the jeeps but after being an automotive tech for 7 years, I personally will never own a Chrysler product.... But I'm not here to bash anyone for their response to this curious gentleman's question. I am sure that jeeps are better build quality than an average Dodge since most are "trail rated".

    BTW the Montero has extra outlets front and rear, selectable 4wd with locking center differential in 4hi lock and 4lo lock as well as just 4hi which is equivalent to what most would call full time fwd or AWD . The drivetrain as in axles and the like are like the transmission and pretty much great in stock form and will not need to be switched out.

    Anyhow, the best way anyone can find what's right for their needs is to research and test drive/ see one in person. Hopefully he will be able to determine what meets his needs so he can get out there and have some fun. Wish you the best sir.
    J.W.
    Build thread http://www.expeditionportal.com/foru...e-build-thread

    95 Monty LS with 33 10.50 KM2s, air locker, winch, snorkel, sliders, bottle opener, and stuff...-EMT,Auto Tech, US ARMY Survival and land navigation specialist, US ARMY VETERAN 1st CAV 1st BGD COLT Team 3

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •