I am really looking hard at a 94 and 95 SWB Classic's. Am I stupid what is the good and bad of these vehicles? Or should I just get a FJ62 and not deal with the headaches of a Rover.
Thank you for any insight you guy can provide.
Regards,
I am really looking hard at a 94 and 95 SWB Classic's. Am I stupid what is the good and bad of these vehicles? Or should I just get a FJ62 and not deal with the headaches of a Rover.
Thank you for any insight you guy can provide.
Regards,
Check out www.lrrforums.com and you will get some great answers. Also www.rangerovers.net. I just bought a 1994 RRC LWB and I LOVE IT!!!!![]()
The RRC is one of the most capable off-roaders out of the box. If it's coil sprung and has CDL it is an excellent overland machine. Bit limited in space, but very comfortable and very capable. Air sprung add complications that may be best avoided. VC is okay for non-technical work, but CDL is better in a pinch.
Look for corrosion. Especially on the tailgate and frame. Also check engines carefully.
cheers
I love my 91. Other than the rust issue I have it's great. You can get a LWB and convert from air suspension to coils and have the extra space.
Dave
99 D2
I've owned a FJ62 and still miss it to this day! In so saying that it can't hold a candle to the comforts of a RR Classic. If you can, go with the 95 as it has the updated dash (Discovery layout).
1997 D-90 SW LE
1989 FJ62
Adventure Trailer Horizon
Tread Lightly! Trainer
KI6GRW
90% of all Land Rovers ever built are still on the road, the other 10% made it home...
Thank you for the feed back. I am not to worried about space at this point, plus finding a LWB with good maintenance history is not an easy task. What is the MPG on these rigs?
Thank you all again.
How much are you looking to spend (you can PM me if you like) and when do you want to buy? If you get a LWB you will have PLENTY of room! I have 4 kids and a wife! I am amazed at how much we can fit in there! When the time comes, let me know and I will help look for you.Originally Posted by sacto_patrol
Also, are you wanting stock or some mods already added? (Hint: they are usually more expensive stock)
Both will get poor mileage. 12-14 on a good day.
The Rover will perform better in the dirt out of the box (better clearance numbers and much better wheel travel) and have a much better road ride. In the Rover, 70 mph cruising is no issue either.
Both have a great look to them.
The Toyota will have the greatest durability and reliability, and better storage space too.
Me too.Originally Posted by Andrew Walcker
Don't know much about LR's other than what I read. While the FJ55 is commonly referred to as the Iron Pig, virtually the same could be said about the 62's. When the Mrs. drove it around town one day I excitedly asked her,
"Honey, what did ya think?"
she replied,
"By the time I get it up to speed after stopping at a red light, I have to stop at another!"
I think she loved the cargo/grocery room but it was not a great commuter. I loved it and MPG be damned, I will have another.
'97 Toyota T100 - some stuff and some stories....
'85 Toyota FJ6O - fractal cruising
currently listening to - Jamey Johnson "The Guitar Song"
recommended reading - Into the Story by David Maraniss
i think that can be said of most rovers as well!Originally Posted by kcowyo