I get 16 mpg on the highway in my Disco, not sure about the RRC.
I get 16 mpg on the highway in my Disco, not sure about the RRC.
Dave
99 D2
Thanks for all the help everyone. I drove a '95 SWB this weekend and besides all the little no working electrical problems (not working sunroof, door locks, passenger window) it just didn't feel like the right vehicle. I love the look of the RRC just not the right vehicle for me.
Thanks again for your help, I appreciate it.
Non-working electrical problems on a RRC???? I'm aghast!!!Originally Posted by sacto_patrol
![]()
Have you driven a 62 yet?
1997 D-90 SW LE
1989 FJ62
Adventure Trailer Horizon
Tread Lightly! Trainer
KI6GRW
90% of all Land Rovers ever built are still on the road, the other 10% made it home...
True, I wasn't worried about the electrical "issues". I would of dealt with them, just the vehicle didn't feel right.
Yes I have drove both FJ62's and 80's both of those vehicles had a sturdiness to them that the RRC honestly lacked. My it was the vehicle a drove, don't know.
IMHO, you are driving some of the finest off road vehicles made available in the US market. I've owned a 62 and an 80 and you can't go wrong with either of these. Good luck with your decision and let us know how it turns out.
1997 D-90 SW LE
1989 FJ62
Adventure Trailer Horizon
Tread Lightly! Trainer
KI6GRW
90% of all Land Rovers ever built are still on the road, the other 10% made it home...
I concur, go with the '95. Updated dash, better A/C (his & hers), etc. The LWB is great for extra space. I had a '91 and should've bought a '95 for more features and comfort. Additionally, the 4.2 has a bit more oomp!
Good luck.