Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread: Parabolic Springs?

  1. #1

    Default Parabolic Springs?

    So I have decided to scratch build my own trailer just can't justify the cost of a AT Chaser. It will be of similar design and size of the chaser but will obviously lack the Chaser's great suspension.

    I need the suspension to be leafs for ease of fabrication but was wondering if Parabolic Leafs would help the ride quality. Everything I have read says on a vehicle they improve ride quality with out sacrificing load capacity. What do you guys think?

    Here is the company's site of the product I was planning on using , originally intended for a jeep yj but should work for a trailer , but not sure if I should the front springs or rear.

    http://www.parabolicsuspension.com/jeep/yj.htm


    Thanks for the input!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Prescott, AZ, USA
    Posts
    3,999
    The Parabolic spring was one of the many options we looked at when we were in the early design stages of our suspension. All the characteristics looked good but from what I remember the practical off road application was bad.

    An aftermarket parabolic spring was manufactured for Land Rovers and every report we read about them said that the vehicle became dangerous to handle at speed and off road. I know this is contradictory to what the web site says about their Land rover application, and the fact Santana uses parabolic springs, but the information did seem sound and to be coming from a lot of varied sources.

    The problem I see with any leaf spring set up, is you have to calculate the spring rating for the maximum load, so anything below that weight results in a rough ride. The stock reply seems to be I always run my trailer full so that is not an issue. Contrary to this perception we see trailer owners running their trailer both "under loaded" and "overloaded". So there is a huge variation is trailer mass.

    An alternative may be a light weight, long spring in combination with an air bag, the trick would be to find the right combination. This combination along with the solid beam axle would price you up into the range of our independent suspension without gaining any of the benefits.

    Life is once again a series of compromises.

  3. #3
    jeffryscott's Avatar
    jeffryscott is offline 2006 Rally Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tucson
    Posts
    1,318
    I had parabolics on my 1967 Series IIa 109 and loved them. The ride was fantastic, and off-road it was great - good articulation. I never felt unsafe with them on either. I'll get parabolics again when I end up with another Series truck.
    2002 Isuzu Trooper. OME suspension, Michelin LTX AT 265/75/16, ARB 47l fridge. A few of my photos here: http://jeffryscott.com/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Prescott, AZ, USA
    Posts
    3,999
    Yeah, parabolic springs seem to have differing parties some who love them and some who don't. Apart from manufacturers testimonials on how great they are there is a mixed bag of feedback from owners on how they perform in the field. I've even heard it said that the only vehicle parabolic springs work on are Land Rovers, who knows??

    Generally parabolic springs do make a vehicle more tippy and bouncy, but in comparison to the stock Series suspension maybe that's a good thing. But I’m sure there are those that would disagree.

    I do like the feature this particular brand has where leaves can be removed or added to change the spring characteristics. It also looks like they use Teflon pads to reduce friction between the leaves, all good stuff.

    Looks like they are made in the Netherlands, and no reference to a USA distributor, that could make them very pricey.

    It would be a grand experiment to see how they worked out on a trailer, I just wouldn’t want to personally put the money out to get the answer when the variables are so large.

  5. #5
    jeffryscott's Avatar
    jeffryscott is offline 2006 Rally Course Champion: Expedition Trophy
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tucson
    Posts
    1,318
    I agree that people either love them or hate them from what I found when I researched it before purchasing.

    I think the company you mention is TC Console or something similar to that. I know someone with a set and they like them (he's got them on at least two vehicles). I went with Rocky Mountain Parabolics, formerly from Wise Owl in Vancouver. Wise Owl has since been purchased by Rover Boys or something similar. (Pulling some names out of memory).

    While I would put parabolics on another Series truck in a second, personally I would defer to Martyn and the others at AT and trust their research.
    2002 Isuzu Trooper. OME suspension, Michelin LTX AT 265/75/16, ARB 47l fridge. A few of my photos here: http://jeffryscott.com/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The Nanny State
    Posts
    5,726
    I don't see how their visually mild difference would result in different ride characteristics from a well sorted "normal" leaf spring.

    The way I would approach a low cost adjustable trailer suspension would be to use leaves under rated for the expected max load, with dampers, and then put a single air spring in the center of the axle. That means that the trailer frame has to be designed to have that significant load applier to the center of one of it's cross members. Best to do some engineering there b4 sparks fly.
    Could even go so far as to use one of the Cad or Lincoln auto ride leveling switches if a compressed air source is available.
    I used to swerve around my hallucinations, now I drive right through them.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Prescott, AZ, USA
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by ntsqd
    I don't see how their visually mild difference would result in different ride characteristics from a well sorted "normal" leaf spring.
    The parabolic shape for the leaf spring is about the biggest design change for leaf springs since the change from horse to horse power, IMHO. Theoretically it provides for a much more supple suspension that should react to changes in terrain in a more applicable manner than regular springs.

    The problem seems to be transferring the theoretical into the practical. Once that has been achieved successfully to decide if you have improved on a design that was faulty in the first place, or come up with something worth it's weight.

    This would then return us to the discussion on the merits of leaf springs as a "hanger" on from antiquity, or a product that just needs more work!

    Why if leaf springs work so well have we had so many design changes in suspension over the past 40 years? Why are some vehicles still running leaf springs? Does the low cost of leaf spring components enter the equation? May be so if recent postings are correct that major car manufactures are making or losing $1500.00 per vehicle sold in the USA.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Tucson, Az.
    Posts
    283
    The quick easy kit form has been put together by 4WD.com. Comes with two, Front or Rear CJ-7 4 or 6 leaf springs, the mounts, shackels, U-bolts and mounting brackets. I paid $448.85. I use the 4 leaf pack (rear-they are longer) and added Monroe air-shocks. I added two rubber bump stops that stop the action at 10inches of flex. IMHO they are very smooth and compliant.
    08' Yellow 4dr Rubi, OME

  9. #9
    Martyn, I want to thank you for your help, I'm truly amazed at how helpful you have been, you have posted helpful information even though I'm not a customer. The time you've taken to provide useful and helpful information is a rare commodity that is much appreciated. Based upon all the research I've done and information you provided I have come up with a solution to my trailer situation. The Chaser is a great trailer and I would love to own one but it doesn't fit all my needs 100% and i can't afford the cost on top of building the two trucks I'm building.

    So I'm picking up a 1/4 ton military trailer and purchasing the AT retro suspension kit. The cost of the suspension is where I feel my money is best spent. I'll be able to modify the trailer to fit my needs by adding a tailgate and removeable rack system, as I don't need a lid.

    Martyn , is the suspension kit available at this time, if not what is the ETA?
    Thanks again for all you help.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Prescott, AZ, USA
    Posts
    3,999
    Quote Originally Posted by detailbarn
    Martyn, I want to thank you for your help, I'm truly amazed at how helpful you have been, you have posted helpful information even though I'm not a customer. The time you've taken to provide useful and helpful information is a rare commodity that is much appreciated. Based upon all the research I've done and information you provided I have come up with a solution to my trailer situation. The Chaser is a great trailer and I would love to own one but it doesn't fit all my needs 100% and i can't afford the cost on top of building the two trucks I'm building.

    So I'm picking up a 1/4 ton military trailer and purchasing the AT retro suspension kit. The cost of the suspension is where I feel my money is best spent. I'll be able to modify the trailer to fit my needs by adding a tailgate and removeable rack system, as I don't need a lid.

    Martyn , is the suspension kit available at this time, if not what is the ETA?
    Thanks again for all you help.
    All the parts are in stock but need to get welded together to form the support cross member. Mario runs production, he's up in Canada right now at the Canadian Off Road Expo but when he gets back we should be able to give you a delivery date.

    I fully understand where your coming from in regard to budgetary constraints, we all have to do what we have to do in order to pay the bills and stay afloat.

    Both Mario and I don't believe in trying to push a sale. It's much more important that a trailer owner ends up with a trailer that is best suited to their needs, not ours. We often refer sales to other companies when it's obvious to us that our product just doesn't meet a customers requirements.

    In the same way disseminating knowledge allows you to make the best choice for you. We have learnt a lot about trailers, sometimes the hard way, so there is no reason you have to learn the same way.

    We also know how hard it is to build a trailer and how depressing it is to put weeks of work into a project and end up with a trailer that is a disappointment.

    At the same time I'm happy that you choose the route you decided upon. I don't think you will be disappointed the 416 and the AT suspension are a good match.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •