Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Thread: Defender 110; vs Range Rover classic

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by overlander View Post
    Dale, I can't imagine how you can make that statement! Having a 110 myself, and being in the military with a bujillion miles in military HMMWV's, I have a spent a good many of those miles wishing I was in my 110, and recalling how much more comfortable thohse washboard roads would be in it. LI have never ridden in a civilian H1, but my understanding is they are almost exactly like the military ones with the exception being some interior refinement. Way louder than a 110 and bone jarring due to their extremely stiff suspension.
    Yes civilian HUMMER H1 IS exactly the same as military humvee .but has much more comfortable seats( made in germany it says on mine.i checked on line its from city bus amazing comfortable ) and sound proofing.driven many other trucks i think it is one of the most comfortable 4x4 but nothing close by to classic range rover. I havent been in defender so i cant say
    If H1 is softer than defender but i would assume they would be the same since they are made to take loads

    So i am looking for one.to import should i get one with 300d or 20o i have no idea about land rover diesels. Or get one that needs

    new 6.2 turbo diesel? Body work is no problem at all. Whay about 130?to long?
    Last edited by REDROVER; 05-28-2012 at 05:53 AM.
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    England (the 'old' one)
    Posts
    388
    I love my 110 but if I lived in a country that had low to zero rust RRC's and cheap fuel, it would be an RRC every day
    M6IRL




    Done a bit...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marshville, NC, USA
    Posts
    1,764
    Mark, I guess the ergonomics is more what I am referring as I fit much better in the H1. Noise, about the same, but the ride of the H1 was better to me. I drove mine to Az and up and down the east coast a bunch- it felt much less choppy.

    There are many arguments concerning 200/300, but the 300 is the later evolvement and quite robust for longevity, though a bit anemic- especially in a 130!! Mark has the 2.8 and can address it better than most anyone. Felix has the 6.2, and yes it fits as dimensionally not much bigger than the Rover V-8.

    You really need to at least drive/sit in them all. Even the 130 has a couple less inches in the back seat than the 110s as the frame and resultant floor area changes. The above analysis about space/storage configuration is pretty spot on, as well as the axle/suspension differences. The 130 rides much better than a 110 as the rear springs are the same, but wheelbase increases 20". Downside for the 130 is maneuverability on tight trails, though climbing ability is enhanced. Always trade offs...
    '13 F-150
    '86 110 3-door
    '97NAS90--->130

    TreadLightly! Trainer
    www.thervrbarn.com

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by Rovertrader View Post
    Mark, I guess the ergonomics is more what I am referring as I fit much better in the H1. Noise, about the same, but the ride of the H1 was better to me. I drove mine to Az and up and down the east coast a bunch- it felt much less choppy.

    There are many arguments concerning 200/300, but the 300 is the later evolvement and quite robust for longevity, though a bit anemic- especially in a 130!! Mark has the 2.8 and can address it better than most anyone. Felix has the 6.2, and yes it fits as dimensionally not much bigger than the Rover V-8.

    You really need to at least drive/sit in them all. Even the 130 has a couple less inches in the back seat than the 110s as the frame and resultant floor area changes. The above analysis about space/storage configuration is pretty spot on, as well as the axle/suspension differences. The 130 rides much better than a 110 as the rear springs are the same, but wheelbase increases 20". Downside for the 130 is maneuverability on tight trails, though climbing ability is enhanced. Always trade offs...
    I spoke with an owner last night in england he wants 4700 British for it its 87 red new motor stick shift. I forgot to ask if its 300 or 200 with shipping and papers i should be under 10 grand .not bad huh?
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    Does the 87 model come with coil springs front and rear?
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    Holly molly look at uk auto trader 100s of defenders Under 4000 price

    http://www.autotrader.co.uk/search/u...efender/page/3
    Last edited by REDROVER; 05-28-2012 at 05:32 PM.
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    England (the 'old' one)
    Posts
    388
    And a decent rust free '87 Classic is like gold dust!

    IMHO the '87 is the best year; with hairy non electric seats, leccy windows and a 2.5TD (VM) that needs to be taken out and replaced with a 200Tdi
    M6IRL




    Done a bit...

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    U can find 100% rust free classics in west cost all day long. I have 1990 almost brand new cond. I am gonna give it as agift to my doctor friend. She loves old rovers
    I know ahe is gonna keep her much better than i do

    Tnx.for the heads up on 87 model. I looking forward to it.even tho its gonna.be pain in the $$$ to drive right hand drive stick shift. Haha but its kinda cool
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Cochise County, AZ
    Posts
    622
    Eric, check out Global Land Rovers: http://www.globallandrovers.com/

    I haven't used them, but others have and he seems to have a pretty good reputation. If I remember correctly, they'll even do mild builds for you so you can get the configuration you want.
    2006 LR3
    2006 KTM Adventure 950

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    England (the 'old' one)
    Posts
    388
    Expensive - but then that seems to be the case for this market
    M6IRL




    Done a bit...

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •