Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Thread: Defender 110; vs Range Rover classic

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Cochise County, AZ
    Posts
    622
    Quote Originally Posted by Nonimouse View Post
    Expensive - but then that seems to be the case for this market
    Yeah... I seem to remember his stock being more varied and a bit more affordable. I don't recognize that website, either, so I might be way off the mark.
    2006 LR3
    2006 KTM Adventure 950

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    J10 M40 Oxfordshire UK
    Posts
    164
    a. few points, the frames are very different , the only commonality being construction. All rovers since series types are coil front and rear, solid(beam axle) with fully floating hubs.
    The RRC apart from Vogue lse are coils . The 110 and 130 have bigger diameter coils at rear , the 130 has secondary coils inside rear main coils. The 90 has rover style diffs front and rear as has RRC, the 110 and 130 had rover type front (apart from some ex mil ) and as mentioned salisbury (Dana) at rear . Bigger and much stronger. RRC with VM avoid PITA . Early 90 and 110 (84-about 88/89) badged 90 or 110 not dfeneder had higher gage alluminium in body panels . You need to be ultra careful buying ex UK as salting on winter roads can cause quite severe corrosion problems. Also some ex mil vehicles did sea wading !! V8 petrol only in early 110 and a very samll number 90 , later 90 V8 auto were special edition and therfore V expensive. HTSH
    1986 110 CSW V8i > TD6
    1992 90 300tdi auto
    1999 P38 DSE Auto
    2001 Freelander TD4 Auto

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    M
    Quote Originally Posted by tacr2man View Post
    a. few points, the frames are very different , the only commonality being construction. All rovers since series types are coil front and rear, solid(beam axle) with fully floating hubs.
    The RRC apart from Vogue lse are coils . The 110 and 130 have bigger diameter coils at rear , the 130 has secondary coils inside rear main coils. The 90 has rover style diffs front and rear as has RRC, the 110 and 130 had rover type front (apart from some ex mil ) and as mentioned salisbury (Dana) at rear . Bigger and much stronger. RRC with VM avoid PITA . Early 90 and 110 (84-about 88/89) badged 90 or 110 not dfeneder had higher gage alluminium in body panels . You need to be ultra careful buying ex UK as salting on winter roads can cause quite severe corrosion problems. Also some ex mil vehicles did sea wading !! V8 petrol only in early 110 and a very samll number 90 , later 90 V8 auto were special edition and therfore V expensive. HTSH
    Thank you very much for the info very helpful
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marshville, NC, USA
    Posts
    1,765
    just as a point of clarification, the D-IIs went to semi-float rear axle.
    '13 F-150
    '86 110 3-door
    '97NAS90--->130

    TreadLightly! Trainer
    www.thervrbarn.com

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    how does the wind sheld come down on defender? i am guessing the roof has to come out right? are all of them the same? way
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marshville, NC, USA
    Posts
    1,765
    NAS trucks were not really designed to fold, as there is a fixed attachment vs. the typical hinged set-up. Easy to swap out, and yes- even the ROW spec trucks need the top off to fold the windscreen. There are two 'pins' on the bottom edge that prevent it from folding with the top affixed.
    '13 F-150
    '86 110 3-door
    '97NAS90--->130

    TreadLightly! Trainer
    www.thervrbarn.com

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by Rovertrader View Post
    NAS trucks were not really designed to fold, as there is a fixed attachment vs. the typical hinged set-up. Easy to swap out, and yes- even the ROW spec trucks need the top off to fold the windscreen. There are two 'pins' on the bottom edge that prevent it from folding with the top affixed.
    ok thats fine so summer time it can be driven as cabrio 87 is the year to stick with,
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marshville, NC, USA
    Posts
    1,765
    I take mine off completely rather than folding it down, as that is one less thing to fret about.
    '13 F-150
    '86 110 3-door
    '97NAS90--->130

    TreadLightly! Trainer
    www.thervrbarn.com

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by Rovertrader View Post
    I take mine off completely rather than folding it down, as that is one less thing to fret about.
    have u ever imported a car before? how does it work, lets say it arives to USA can we drive home and then to the paper work or conversion? what do i need to change on that 87 defender to make it usa DOT pass.?

    thank you

    Eric
    1989 LAND ROVER
    LAND CRUISER COMING SOON
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf9FPs40VUM

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marshville, NC, USA
    Posts
    1,765
    Several. No changes needed as that is the whole jest of the 25 year rule. I would suggest contacting Doug who posted on my 130 thread, Dividing Creek, as he is the go to man, and can clear it for you at customs.
    '13 F-150
    '86 110 3-door
    '97NAS90--->130

    TreadLightly! Trainer
    www.thervrbarn.com

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •