Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread: Looking at getting a bike

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    16

    Default Looking at getting a bike

    I have a good deal of experience riding on the street and dirt but this Dual Sport realm is new to me. I am in the process of getting a used bike and have kind of narrowed it down. One would be the KTM 640 adventure and the other is the Kawasaki KLR 650. From the bikes I am looking at they come with panniers and are well set up for the needs I am looking for. 1 of course is for commuting to work 30 miles one way, and the other is to start doing some over night exploring of Colorado and the nearby states on a bike instead of my Land Rover.

    Any thoughts on reliability, options available, or anything I might not be considering in my purchase. A friend of mine suggests the Suzuki DRZ but I am not as familiar with it as the 2 aforementioned bikes.

    these are some of the examples of what I have found thus far: (there are some BMW's in there but I know nothing about them personally)

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3041134044.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3063021044.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3067880909.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3067598361.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3054229471.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcd/3058918261.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3011958161.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/mcy/3036714328.html
    Last edited by green; 06-11-2012 at 01:42 PM.
    '89 RRC 35's
    '97 DI 35's
    '02 KLR

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,030
    I might not be the best guy to listen to. Once I rode a KTM I haven't looked at much else.
    Having owned a BMW GS and several other Japanese bikes, Id say I have a good basis for my opinion. I have also considered buying a 640 or 690 to share ride time with my 990. I really like the idea of a light weight all rounder for rides like the TAT, and some local area dirt stuff. I love my 990 but sometimes a smaller bike would be nice, and at this point the 640 or 690 would be my first go to bike.

    They both look to be well set up and clean. They are hard to find in my area so 2 to choose from is nice. Id say the lower mile bike would be my first choice for obvious reasons. Although the higher mile 640 has been well set up and those add on's are pricey. So setting up the more virgin bike could get expensive if that the direction you go. Id say my first choice wold be the KTM with the KLR a far second and the BMW even further for me.

    The KLR is a great bike but maybe not as high quality as the KTM in regards to riding in the dirt. Can it go any place YES will it be as fun as a KTM NO. My brother and I had one for a while. Is was a good bike simple easy to ride. Reliable. Just a good all around dual sport.

    As for the BMW they are sorta great bikes. They do most things well.

    The price difference from a KLR to the BMW or KTM is substantial but Id still spring for a KTM personally. I just like them, They make you smile.

    This is all just my opinion. Once I rode a KTM I pretty much was sold. So I hope nobody cracks me to hard.
    2006 Toyota Tacoma Ute.
    1994 LandRover D1
    2008 KTM 990 ADV-sold
    1972 Toyota LC FJ-40-sold
    1992 SWB RR Classic-sold
    2006 BMW GS1200-sold

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    No. Virginia
    Posts
    103
    Just some opinionated thoughts to consider:

    You mention "30 mile one way commuting": if that is a "most days" type of thing on the MC your considering, and involves highway speeds, then my thought is that the MC design and available options MUST support that type of riding - making it comfortable and fun. Several of the 650 choices offer good highway cruising (well within optimum RPM and vibration range), big to fairly big fuel tanks, and decent OEM or aftermarket fairing/windshield choices. If you ain't happy commuting...you suffer every day.

    Storage Considerations: for commuting or camping hard bags here really work great. Especially the locking aspect for commuting. For tough challenging riding off road...soft bags are easier on your legs.

    Working on the bike: for any bike...what services are you going to do, how often do you want to do them, and what does it cost? This varies by the type of bike AND the owner. Read what it takes (or costs) to change oil, air filter, adjust valves...some bikes are much more involved than others.

    I came off bigger bikes and now I have a KLR (just so you know), and I am really pleased on what a thumper can do...on an interstate, a side road, and a dirt road (or light trail)...all the bikes you mention have the ability to make your day...some offer more or less in some areas...but these bikes can do it all.

    Jump on one and ride!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    16
    Thanks for the input! Thus far I am leaning toward the KTM though the 2 that were for sale here are now gone. I have a friend that owns a motorcycle service shop that has advised me against it unless I go for the higher cc 990 due to his experience with what service he does on the bikes. He swears by the KLR and what engine service and ease of service he or I will do to the bike. I am still looking and have not made a purchase yet. If another KTM does not fall into my lap I will buy a KLR with no regrets. My question would then be pre 2008 or post KLR.
    '89 RRC 35's
    '97 DI 35's
    '02 KLR

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Clarksville, Tennessee, United States
    Posts
    458
    Quote Originally Posted by green View Post
    My question would then be pre 2008 or post KLR.
    Mechanically, there is very little different between the two. The suspension was "revised" for the 08+ models and has larger forks, but not much larger (2mm, I believe). In my opinion, the biggest difference between the 2 is plastics. The 08+ models have much more plastic and are therefore more susceptible to damage (without aftermarket protection) and the earlier models are therefore a little bit more crash-worthy out of the box. Beyond that, it's all about looks, in my opinion.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Leon, WV
    Posts
    12
    The KLR and 640 ADV are both nice bikes. They will both do what you want. the klr will be cheaper initially and in the long run. The KTM will cost more and take more maintenance. If you start pushing the bikes limits offroad the KTM wil take you much farther and keep you smiling longer. It has a great suspension and great brakes. The engine is STRONG but it also vibrates a lot. Both bikes need new seats. IMO the KLR suspension is its biggest downfall. Its low budget and shows. The KLR is reliable as an anvil and simple to work on and maintain.

    Try to ride both and one will likely fit better and/or be more comfortable. You will know which is right for you. IMHO stay away from the 08-up KLR. The 08 and some 09 have oiling issues, the motor can and will eat oil and grenade on you. They have too much plastic and do not hold up well to drops offroad. The 07-older are great bikes and can be abused.

    just to throw a wrench in your plan, check out the DR650. Its old school air cooled, super simple, super reliable and can be modded affordably to do anything and everything you want. The xr650 is the same way. The DR is considerably lighter than the KLR as well.

    Lots of options and lots of choices. Keep in mind you can almost buy two bikes for the price of a KTM. I love KTMs but they are pricey. For the same price as a nice 07 640 ADV, you could buy a nice commuter bike and a fun small DS bike. Something like a used kawasaki Versys and an older DRZ400 will be close to the same price as a low mile 640adv. good luck...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    16
    Thanks again for even more useful info. I have expanded my search and have considered the XR650 as well. There are some nice ones for sure but I do not know much about those either.
    I will continue looking while on vacation these next two weeks.
    '89 RRC 35's
    '97 DI 35's
    '02 KLR

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    6
    When it comes to bikes I always ask what type of personality do you have? Do you like performance and style or are you more likely the type to ride in jeans and work boots?

    The KTM 640 ADV is a very nice bike and will have better suspension, more power and far more sex appeal than the KLR 650. The KLR 07 and prior can be had much cheaper (and are more common) than the KTM and while they won't be as fancy nor as high performing as the KTM, they are quite reliable. Plenty of guys on ADVrider have KLRs with 50,000+ miles on their motors.

    The XR650R was the bike of choice for Baja Racers between 2000 and 2006 or so (its still used but has now been replaced by 450s). The XR is reliable yes, but not like a KLR. The XR can be molded into a great desert race bike. It won't have the subframe support needed to maintain long distance touring nor support panniers. You would have to build/support the subframe.

    A riding partner of mine bought an XR650R for fast dirt touring. He is also a skilled dirt rider.


    So, my opinion (which isn't worth anything) is KTM if you like nice very high quality bikes, KLR if you prefer simplicity and don't need to be fashionable and the XR if you want to go lighter and fast. 08 and newer KLRs seem more road focused than the 07 and prior.

    I ride a DRZ btw. Here is a funny video

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    16
    Love the video! I am definitely impressed by the KLR following.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
    '89 RRC 35's
    '97 DI 35's
    '02 KLR

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Leon, WV
    Posts
    12
    [QUOTE=Goofy Footer;1127613]When it comes to bikes I always ask what type of personality do you have? Do you like performance and style or are you more likely the type to ride in jeans and work boots?

    The KTM 640 ADV is a very nice bike and will have better suspension, more power and far more sex appeal than the KLR 650. The KLR 07 and prior can be had much cheaper (and are more common) than the KTM and while they won't be as fancy nor as high performing as the KTM, they are quite reliable. Plenty of guys on ADVrider have KLRs with 50,000+ miles on their motors.

    The XR650R was the bike of choice for Baja Racers between 2000 and 2006 or so (its still used but has now been replaced by 450s). The XR is reliable yes, but not like a KLR. The XR can be molded into a great desert race bike. It won't have the subframe support needed to maintain long distance touring nor support panniers. You would have to build/support the subframe.

    A riding partner of mine bought an XR650R for fast dirt touring. He is also a skilled dirt rider.


    So, my opinion (which isn't worth anything) is KTM if you like nice very high quality bikes, KLR if you prefer simplicity and don't need to be fashionable and the XR if you want to go lighter and fast. 08 and newer KLRs seem more road focused than the 07 and prior.

    I ride a DRZ btw. Here is a funny video
    QUOTE]

    I should have been more specific when I mentioned XR's. The XR/R is a desert race bike, water cooled, kick only etc. They can be made into very nice DS bikes and are very reliable. I was actually referring to the XR650L that they still sell today. Air cooled, old school simple bike. Stout subframe, etc... I would still pick a DR650 over a XR/L and both over the KLR. Of course if my budget allowed I would have a 640adv in the shed .

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •