Jeep Cherokee XJ - Contender for the Overlanding Crown?

[deadbeat son]

Yep, no-frills pretty much says it. I've heard others say the same of their driver's seat, but I must have got the stand-out because I routinely have passengers comment on comfort of the front seats and I've done the 15 hour drive to NY and back to NC a few times now without any complaints.

The seat was fine for short jaunts, but I drove my XJ from Denver to visit a friend north of Syracuse, NY, with a quick stop in southern Mississippi on the way. That was a seriously long trip and the seat left me in pain for a few days afterward. Needless to say, I dreaded the drive home, even without the MS leg on the return trip.

Also, the little button on the right side of the posts with the (")+ logo allows you to quote multiple posts in a single reply.

[reece146]

To your comment about build quality in 97+ models, I don't know man - maybe you've run into some banged up ones but the interior of my 2001 is rock solid and, beyond some rust, when I get under my Jeep everything has been well-maintained enough to keep it in pretty impeccable shape for a decade old vehicle. But you're right, the key is a solid engine and platform for build-out into a trail monster.

Nah, my 2001 was bought as a two year old lease return with hardly any mileage on it in 2003. It was in showroom fresh condition except for some dog hair in the cargo hold.

They just aren't very well built vehicles. Take apart a couple hundred other vehicles of better quality and you'll see what I mean.

[jeepdreamer]

I would say the quality was not to dissimilar to a lot the ChyCo was putting out at that time period. Not sure why but they have always been known for poor plastic. Ask any Dodge pick up owner from the early 90s on and you will hear tales of woe about entire dashboards disintegrating into nothing. From a materials standpoint I'd say maybe the older XJs got a little better quality of plastic. But I'd have to say that neither one is perfect and the lack of cup holders on the early Gens is a PITA. Sounds stupid but it really does suck. And while my 01 has the two in the center console... it would be nice if the console itself wasn't leaning over towards the passenger. Why nobody makes a full, steel, well engineered replacement console for these is beyond me. Tuffy makes them for all manner of other Jeeps but the XJ only gets a drop in version. When I get more time on my hands and actually start to mess with it more, I plan to see what I can come up with. I'm no rocket surgeon but maybe even I can figure something out. Cheesy hang on door cup holders just don't work for the early Gens and there always seems to be better ways to do the wheel...

[ADK_XJ]

Nah, my 2001 was bought as a two year old lease return with hardly any mileage on it in 2003. It was in showroom fresh condition except for some dog hair in the cargo hold.

They just aren't very well built vehicles. Take apart a couple hundred other vehicles of better quality and you'll see what I mean.

Can't argue with your experience - I guess the years have just been kind to mine. The only area that I've noticed poor durability is on the plastic snaps holding the bottoms of door panels in. I know I was personally responsible for a couple when overhauling the stereo, but if they made some solid replacement pieces for those I'd be buying!

Tuffy makes them for all manner of other Jeeps but the XJ only gets a drop in version. When I get more time on my hands and actually start to mess with it more, I plan to see what I can come up with. I'm no rocket surgeon but maybe even I can figure something out. Cheesy hang on door cup holders just don't work for the early Gens and there always seems to be better ways to do the wheel...

Yeah, I've noticed quite a few options for the 80s-early 90s models, but nothing in the late model ranges. Too bad, I'd love a locking insert to put any number of things in that I don't want people ripping out.

[intothewild]

I have owned several xj's. From a horrible carb'd 2.8l model, to a 4.0/ax15 with 6.5" of lift and everything in between. For the price, the availability of parts whether new or used, the drivetrain reliability, and overall simplicity they are hard to beat. I now have a 97 zj which is very similar to the xj as far as underpinnings, just with a few extra electrical doodads to break.

After owning 5 xj's, 2 4runners and a built K5, I have to admit that the zj is probably my favorite. Comfort/capability/affordability all wrapped up into one.

[old_man]

ExpoRig.jpg
Here is my XJ. I built a 4.7L stroker for it. It has 35" tires with Dana 44's front and rear. It is a very capable rock crawler but it also has very good highway manners.

[Black_ZJ]

I love my Cherokees, but if I were to set up another rig running 31-33 inch tires for expedition type travel then I would choose the Isuzu Trooper over the Cherokee next time around. They have more cargo room, can run 31's bone stock or 33's for under $500, ride smoother, and are more reliable. Same price range too.

[MCObray]

I sold my XJ last week.

My pros: Cheap to purchase. Great after-market support. Simplicity. Lots of interchangeable parts through ZJ, WJ, TJ, etc. 4.0L Straight Six, coupled with the AW4 transmission and NP-231 Transfer Case is a good, solid powerplant.

My cons: Interior components feel cheap. Interior passenger side was small, and cramped for the co-pilot. Interior cab was noisy when rolling down the highway at 60+ MPH. Electrical gremlins plague the vehicle (passenger having no control over windows). Aside from the powerplant (4.0L, AW4, NP-231), the vehicles build quality lacks. Stock headlights are terrible. You'll need at least 2.5"-3", SYE/T-Case Drop (varies for each XJ), to run 31s comfortably. Unibody. Something always needs to be replaced, or so it seems.

Again, these are just my experience with the XJ. Overall, the XJ is a good first vehicle. I love the front fascia of the XJ. They are very easy to work on, and allow you to grow to be mechanically savvy. I enjoyed my XJ very much, and it was tough to let it go.

Would I buy one again? Potentially, but not to be the primary source of transportation.

[cshontz]

Where the XJ does irrefutably shine is in its off-road prowess, and how it aptly leverages both "sport" and "utility". Where it falters is in its build quality. While the powertrain is one of the platform's strongest merits, the rest of the car (electrics, unibody, interior) isn't built to last. What this leaves you with is a disposable SUV - one that performs exceptionally while in its prime, but one that isn't ideal for extended off-pavement travel. This is likely why it's often omitted from our beloved overlanding publication(s).

I had the pleasure of attending Northeast Overland Rally this past fall, and immediately after my Cherokee effortlessly traversed a technical gully, Peter Vollers walked past my open window and remarked, "The XJs always make it."

That they do.

They might not give Cherokees that much attention in OJ and ExPo, but that doesn't matter - because Cherokees tend to validate themselves.

[draganof]

This is an oustanding thread. I have owned Cherokees since I bought my first one new in 1991 and I still have that one going on 300,000 miles. I agree with everything said about the XJ's. However, I do not want the XJ's to become popular Expedition Vehicles. I don't want them to be desired by anyone. There are lots of spare parts and XJ's for sale cheap and that is good because that means I'll have parts to keep my XJ's going for many years. So please EP continue to ignore them. Those of us that have them know why they are great and the rest just need to admit they are envious.