
Originally Posted by
off-roader
So to summarize for the OP...
Is the Mitsu IFS sufficient for your goals? Yes. It's more than fine for the kind of wheeling you have in mind unless you plan on running 40" tires, etc.
From my experience the Mitsu IFS does appear to be built better & is more capable at handling larger tires on harder trails than many other stock 4x4 IFS systems.
Case in point... Carlos (CAP510), Lloyd (Lloyd Swartz), Adam (Sneaky Ninja), myself and I'm sure many others have run 35" & some even 37" tires on the stock Gen I & II IFS axles/differentials on rock crawling trails w/out IFS issues.
Are these needed for your current travel goal? No. My recommendation is to service your diffs, xcase, transmission then go with a 31-33" tire and not worry about it.

Thanks Off-Roader that makes perfect sense, and thanks everyone else for the helpful input! I think for the journey originally described my Gen 1 would be just fine with some maintenance like mentioned to make sure it is up to par and functioning safely and reliably. Personally, I think I will always have a warm feeling for trucks like the Defender or Land Cruiser with solid axles, but the interesting point is that there are other similarly capable vehicles out there that also have strong points (like high speed dirt road travel vs slow rock crawling etc). I think it might come down to an expedition vehicle being a tool for the job. Since any good mechanic wouldn't use the same tool in every situation, so a good adventurer would use a different suspension setup depending on the journey.
1990 Montero LWB 5spd 165k Miles (Project)
2000 Land Rover Discovery Series II Auto 128k Miles (Wife's)
1998 BMW 328i (Daily Driver)
"I was happy to shift my attention to my dear friend, the battered steamboat. I climbed on board. She sounded as hollow as a cookie tin. She was cheaply built and ugly, but I’d spent so much time working on her that I’d come to love her. No influential friend would have done more for me than she did." - Joseph Conrad