Thread: CA Sits on $52 Mill

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    1

    Default CA Sits on $52 Mill

    Not sure where else to post this...$52 Million dollar surplus WITH $33.5 IN THE OHV FUND!

  2. #2
    Don't worry, Sacramento has probably spent it six times over, since they found out about it. What's also criminal, is that the OHV fund, funded by Green stickers. I believe the California's Off-Highway Vehicle Parks Fund is 100 percent user-funded, and to then blatantly reappropriate this money (steal) it to offset deficits in the state park budget. What pure incompetence.


    Herb
    1969 Bronco, 351W, ZF 5spd + Atlas
    2001 Ford Excursion 4x4, 7.3L
    2012 Appalachian Teardrops Krawler 459

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Greenwood, Ca
    Posts
    391

    Default Slush Fund

    I'm racing to post this and you beat me to it, Yea!!

    http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/21/464...k-outrage.html

    I would like to know how much she makes. Can you be educated and that unaware?
    Greenwood, CA. USA
    www.overlandwerks.com
    1985 FJ60 Cummins 6BT5.9
    1971 FJ40 Vortec V6
    1967 Satillite
    1967 GTX
    1968 Charger
    1921 Essex .....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    West Coast, USA
    Posts
    242
    Relating to California trail closures, etc.: if you want to "get behind" something, I think this is it:
    http://www.pacificlegal.org/releases...recreationists

    The lawsuit targets the implementation of the Forest Service’s 2005 Travel Management Rule at the Tahoe National Forest. “The Rule calls for an open and transparent process for designation of roads and trails available to the public for motorized recreation,” said Middleton. “But the implementation of the rule at the Tahoe National Forest has been anything but transparent. Contrary to assurances that public recreational access has been protected, the agency has ended up prohibiting motorized off-road vehicles on hundreds of miles of roads and trails that have been traditionally available to the public for recreational purposes.

    “This was a bait and switch game,” Middleton continued. “The Forest Service lulled people into complacency over the 2005 Travel Management Rule and said recreational enthusiasts had nothing to fear. But then, we find out that over 800 miles of roads or trails are going to be blocked off from traditional motorized recreational uses. In the end, less than 50 miles of formerly accessible trails have been left open for off-road motorized use.
    Apparently, from comments on various message boards, etc. ( http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1079127 ), offroaders were basically recruited for gps mapping of the trails in order to provide information for maintenance, etc., for the NF folks; but instead they just said "thank you and now those trails are closed".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •