Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Thread: 2014 Tacoma to share design with HiLux ?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Containerized View Post
    Planner - I'd heard they were all Mexico-built now, primarily for environmental reasons. Something about the resin system used for the bed.

    Probably the same reason certain Prius assemblies are built in Mexico - they're nasty for the environment (not to mention the environmental effects of dumping the car and the non-recyclable batteries into the landfill at the end of the vehicle's life...).
    As an environmental remediation specialist who deals with automotive-related toxics every day, I can tell you that NiMH batteries are not only completely recyclable, but they're also completely nontoxic. There's no part of a Prius battery that's more environmentally unfriendly than any other given hundred pounds of metal. Naturally, there's unavoidable environmental impacts associated with mining and metal production that apply to any metal object or structure, but nickel is staggeringly common, produced around the world, and present in many alloys and common objects. It's not a problem.

    Also, you should understand that Toyota offers a bounty on old batteries reconditions old batteries, and in fact the batteries bear a 1-800 number that you can call and arrange for the battery to be picked up for free. At the end of a Prius' life, they're typically disassembled and their parts salvaged just like any other car...and you'd have to be some kind of idiot to send a Prius battery to the landfill, because they fetch $700-800 apiece on Ebay.

    There is no reason to believe that the Prius is any more environmentally unfriendly at the end of its life than any other car. I'm not sure where you're getting your information, or if you're just making assumptions, but...

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    27
    Anyway, back on topic...I've driven Hiluxes. They're tanks, and insanely capable. But they're not what US truck buyers are really looking for.

    Personally, I think it'd make the most sense for the Taco and Hilux to share interiors, body panels and structure, seats, and so forth, but have differentiated frames and drivetrains. The Taco could ride on a frame variant and suspension setup more optimized for low cost, smooth ride, and towing for the American market, and the Hilux could get its fully boxed, high-payload, utilitarian frame. Of course, drivetrains would vary based on market. Basically, I'm envisioning something like the difference between the Ram 1500 and the 2500/3500 variant - same body, different frame and drivetrains. The Hilux would be sort of a "Tacoma Heavy Duty" and, for that matter, could even be sold as such in the US market. Maybe they'd have better luck with that than the Tundra.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    1,030
    Redrock, your thinking makes the most sense yet on how this could play out commercially. And thanks for the insight into the battery discussion.

    Don

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Rochester, Michigan
    Posts
    47
    While this is all good dialogue, the article that initiated this thread has several inaccuracies ( 2 corrections are- Sequoia is dead in 2015 and the new Tundra doesn’t launch until model year 2015). The auto industry forecasting services have published this info months ago. Auto News and it’s contributors, Mark Rechtin and Mark Williams should know better, this article appears to be outdated. “Next Generation Tacoma could align with Hilux”? If anything, Toyota will separate the models. As Toyota moves to make each region more autonomous, in North America in particular, we will see different Toyota vehicles than the rest of the world. Of course this strategy is in conflict with Toyota’s, and the rest of the industry, move toward global development and sourcing. But never the less, as Toyota’s Technical Center in North America becomes responsible for more models, North America will see more unique vehicles. The logic is that a vehicle should be designed for a specific market, not a global “one size” fits all approach. Toyota is also working to be less reliant on Japan sourced parts. So by locally sourcing, common parts with other models is less important.

    In the past, TTC, with Calty design, and help from TMC in Japan for the drive train, developed the Sienna, Tundra, Sequoia, Avalon and the Venza, all North American unique models. Moving forward TTC will take responsibility for the Tacoma and the Camry. Look for these next models to be more specific to what Toyota believes is what Americans (and to a lesser degree due to market size, Canadians and Mexicans) are looking for.

    The future of the Tacoma? A model year 2016 major/minor change (probably same frame and a similar, if not the same, drive train), different sheet metal and updated safety and features technology. That is probably about it. It will not be much different than today’s Tacoma. But why should it? It is by far the best selling vehicle in it’s segment. If it’s not broke, why fix it? Toyota is back on top, they have recovered from the recalls, the tsunami and Thailand flood set backs and have regained the title of the number one car manufacturer (most global sales).

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,080
    Quote Originally Posted by Redrock View Post
    The Hilux would be sort of a "Tacoma Heavy Duty" and, for that matter, could even be sold as such in the US market. Maybe they'd have better luck with that than the Tundra.
    I could see that, like with their compact 1 ton they used to make for the US market, it would have to get amazing fuel economy to draw buyers away from
    the fullsize domestics.

    2mre5no.jpg

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Northern Arizona
    Posts
    1,725
    I could see a Tacoma or Hilux option but not the Hilux (Tacoma HD) replacing a Tundra...you said it best...why would I (ie typical american consumer) pay 33 grand for a tacoma when I can buy a crew cab F150/Tundra that can haul 4 adults comfortably and lots of gear in the bed...
    If anything the tacoma will get more unibody/comfy/mpg increase/crossover looking/etc while the tundra gets bigger and cushier probably with less payload...

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Northern Arizona
    Posts
    1,725
    Quote Originally Posted by Kermit View Post
    I could see that, like with their compact 1 ton they used to make for the US market, it would have to get amazing fuel economy to draw buyers away from
    the fullsize domestics.

    2mre5no.jpg
    And would you drive that ugly beast around...would be good for firewood hauling...or my dirtbikes that I can't ride in the national forest

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,080
    Quote Originally Posted by Flagster View Post
    I could see a Tacoma or Hilux option but not the Hilux (Tacoma HD) replacing a Tundra...you said it best...why would I (ie typical american consumer) pay 33 grand for a tacoma when I can buy a crew cab F150/Tundra that can haul 4 adults comfortably and lots of gear in the bed...
    If anything the tacoma will get more unibody/comfy/mpg increase/crossover looking/etc while the tundra gets bigger and cushier probably with less payload...
    I should of said, "yeah I could see that... in my dreams...." lol


    Speaking of Tundras, I went and test drove one...felt like a little kid in it, my gawd that thing is huge.
    I go back and forth on the Tacoma vs a Fullsize...for my needs.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    4,080
    Quote Originally Posted by Flagster View Post
    And would you drive that ugly beast around...would be good for firewood hauling...or my dirtbikes that I can't ride in the national forest
    I don't see them very often down here in the Ol' Pueblo, did happen to see one going down the road in front
    of me the other day, and wondered how many dirtbikes I could fit on the flatbed...even the girlfriend asked
    why I don't own flat bed...

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Northern Arizona
    Posts
    1,725
    There a a couple here in Flag that a local metal supply yard uses for delivery...Recently I have been looking at V10 F450s with a 16ft flatbed...and johnny lift hydraulic loader...then I can load my bikes and my Tacoma in the back...might as well take all the toys...
    One even came with a blue boy loader so you can take your own personal crapper...

    Flatbeds are cool with no lift (ie 2 feet off the ground)...I have considered flatbedding my tacoma but I think the bed would be like 4 feet off the ground...not too conducive to bike loading...

    And yes...driving a tundra is like piloting a cavernous offshore center console with triple 350 outboards...love the power but the dissociation from your surroundings is odd...when I drove one I seemed to wallow in the empty space

    Back on topic...I like little trucks and I like that you can still get the tacoma with a manual tranny...but if the Tundra ever came with a standard transmission it would be hard to resist with that motor...

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •