Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Thread: Tiny stoves

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    156
    Quote Originally Posted by AeroNautiCal View Post
    With the MSR, high levels of carbon monoxide was a factor.

    BackPackingLight.com (BPL.com) ran very extensive tests which confirmed this.
    Do you have a direct link to their tests? Just curious how much more carbon monoxide as opposed to others; I guess it would make sense with their catalytic type stove but they are all supposed to be used in non enclosed spaces right?

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prescott, AZ
    Posts
    3,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Salue View Post
    If wind is a concern, maybe take a look at the MSR Reactor; they are pricier than the Jetboil but from reading reviews and some Youtube videos, it appears that wind is less of a factor as opposed to the Jetboil in the wind. They have a few different size pots now for the Reactor. I have the Reactor 1.7L pot and am amazed at how quick it boils. I've seen the Jetboil in action but don't own one.

    Salue
    The Reactor is the fastest to a boil (half liter) at an average of 90 seconds. The Jeboil hovers around 2:30 for the same volume of water. MSR claims the Reactor will boil at 90 seconds in a 12mph wind. The Jetboil in that same wind will never achieve boil.

    Stay tuned for a head to head review of these two stoves on the ExPo home page. I used them side by side and alternating on various trips over the last 6 months (That was as soon as I could get a pre-release 1L Reactor) and there is a hands down winner.
    Bicycles rule.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    156
    Did I miss the review or is still in the making?

    Quote Originally Posted by Flounder View Post
    The Reactor is the fastest to a boil (half liter) at an average of 90 seconds. The Jeboil hovers around 2:30 for the same volume of water. MSR claims the Reactor will boil at 90 seconds in a 12mph wind. The Jetboil in that same wind will never achieve boil.

    Stay tuned for a head to head review of these two stoves on the ExPo home page. I used them side by side and alternating on various trips over the last 6 months (That was as soon as I could get a pre-release 1L Reactor) and there is a hands down winner.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    508
    I've used my jetboils in Alaska on our 100 mile river float trips in driving rain, much stronger than 12mph winds with no issue at all. That's at close to sea level. Boils just fine every time. I live at 5k feet and play up to 10k feet. I've noticed boil times extend a little up near 10k feet with the jetboils, especially if its cold. If your worried about sipping fuel, the reactor seems to use less per boil from everything I've read. I own 3 Jetboils and a Primus(almost identical to jetboil but with a crappy pot attachment). They have treated me well with no failures whatsoever in the 9 years I've been using them.
    That said, I really like my Kelly kettle and the $15 swiss ranger stoves I've bought from cheaper than dirt. I can boil 2 cups of water with a hand full of mulch in a little over 4 minutes. Can't beat that.


    Quote Originally Posted by Flounder View Post
    The Reactor is the fastest to a boil (half liter) at an average of 90 seconds. The Jeboil hovers around 2:30 for the same volume of water. MSR claims the Reactor will boil at 90 seconds in a 12mph wind. The Jetboil in that same wind will never achieve boil.

    Stay tuned for a head to head review of these two stoves on the ExPo home page. I used them side by side and alternating on various trips over the last 6 months (That was as soon as I could get a pre-release 1L Reactor) and there is a hands down winner.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Hampton Roads, VA
    Posts
    125
    I've been using a Jetboil for years since the gen1 version and love them. Currently have a Ti Sol model that I make coffee and tea with while the food is cooking on the snowpeak Baja burner. Also take it sometimes on quick out and back road trips for hot drinks and food if I'm planning on camping at a park rather than a hotel or B&B.
    2011 Taco TRD-OR
    ICON Stage 3 Suspension, ARB Deluxe Bumper, ARB OBA, RI Lights, Softopper, ARB 2000mm Awning, BajaRack, ARB 50QT Fridge & Slide, Sleeping Platform

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, Ca
    Posts
    1,051
    Love my Snowpeak LiteMax Ti...weights nothing but throws a LOT of heat!. Works well all the way up to 13000-14000ft, though it does take a bit longer to boil water up there, but that is to be expected. Has works great in strong winds as well.
    Robert
    KG6BRB (Radio Installed finally, now trying to learn to use it)
    2006 Tacoma Access Cab (SLOW build thread: http://www.expeditionportal.com/foru...ad.php?t=36561)

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    577
    Quote Originally Posted by Salue View Post
    Do you have a direct link to their tests? Just curious how much more carbon monoxide as opposed to others; I guess it would make sense with their catalytic type stove but they are all supposed to be used in non enclosed spaces right?

    I read it on Back Packing Light.com, here are some very interesting quotes,

    # The best performing upright stove (Snow Peak GST100) produced something like 5 ppm at a simmer, compared with 300 ppm for the Reactor.
    # The best performing upright stove (Snow Peak GST100) produced something like 21 ppm at full bore, compared with 80 - 100 ppm for the Reactor.
    # Two other heat exchanger stoves tested (Primus EtaPower EF and Jetboil GCS) produced something like 3 - 5 ppm at a simmer, compared with 300 ppm for the Reactor.
    # The best performing heat exchanger stove (Primus EtaPower EF) produced something like 13 ppm at full bore, compared with 80 - 100 ppm for the Reactor.
    One cannot help feeling that MSR - or at least the company's lawyers - are really, really worried about this stove. I have never before seen such a density of prominent alarmist warnings on a single stove. We know stoves have to be handled with some care, but the warnings’ effect simply convinces me that MSR is really worried about this stove in particular. So where does that leave me, the customer?
    http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-...5EEM_V5TvXL7jw

  8. #58
    I would never use the MSR reactor in a confined space.

    The good news is that it is extremely wind resistant, so I don't ever need to.

    It's my favorite stove for winter/snow-melting duties.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •