Hmmm...
Missed this up until now--got busy winning the war. It seems that it may be a little late for another opinion, but here it is anyway. I don't frequent too many forums except ExPo and Mud--the mud politics and religion section is a pretty good success story. Nobody goes in there unless they bring their "A" game and much intelligent discussion is had by all (well, most). Any time a thread in another section gets political, it gets moved to P&R and left to die a slow death. You are required to sign up for access to the sub section--keeps the transient trolls at bay and is pretty useful overall. Personal attacks and inappropriate content get reported to the mods so the mods don't have to read through all the drivel.
That being said, there are a lot of political things that I don't particularly want to read about or discuss at length...again. I guess if those subjects come up, I'll just have to use a bit of self control and not click on the thread.
I'll end with this (got a little longer than I expected--sorry). I am a little disappointed that blatantly political issues such as land use, water rights, and public land access are encouraged as pertinent to the "ExPo" discussion, but gun law discussions are not allowed because they are too political. I suspect that a thread about freedom of the press would not get locked, nor would a thread about freedom of assembly (overland expo anybody?). I am interested in discussions about land use and public access in other countries as I may travel there. I know that the U.S. isn't very exotic to most, but I would assume that overlanders coming to the U.S. would be at least a little interested in the state of our public lands and how to avoid common pitfalls(campfire rules, seasonal access, etc.) It seems to follow then that we (mostly you guys) as overlanders should be curious about gun laws in other countries, and the folks from other countries may be curious about our gun laws. There is enough diversity in gun laws from state to state that it would be a good idea to learn the basics of each state before a trip, especially if English is not one's first language. I am also very interested in gun laws and their success (or lack thereof) in other countries. It gives us some perspective about the potential way ahead just as land use precedents in other countries can give us an idea of what works and what doesn't. I also don't want to end up on the wrong end of a 3rd world legal system.
So then, concerns about protecting oneself from critters, both four-legged and two-legged, have a very prominent place in an overlanding discussion. When one's ability to do so is threatened, it seems that ExPo would make a decent place to discuss the ramifications and alternatives. Many (most) countries have stricter gun laws that the U.S. How do they skin the cat of personal protection? I don't know, but I would be interested to hear about it. Coming to a thread about American gun laws as a Panamanian, Afghan, or Uzbek, and telling us we are all paranoid is not helpful and does not add to the discussion. As with any other subject, on the forum, post what is pertinent to the topic at hand or move along to something else. I won't be stopping by any discussions on Aussie gun laws and ridiculing their constitution and lack of personal protection. I will lurk for a bit and file things away for future use though.
As with EVERY other discussion about any topic on the forum, if I don't have anything to add or don't care about the subject, I don't post(or don't read the thread). It has been demonstrated that the vast majority of folks on ExPo can have a civilized discussion about guns. Those who have nothing to add except complaints about crazy Americans should probably refrain from posting unless they have something pertinent to add. If you don't feel that guns are needed on a trip, feel free to let us know what your plan is for personal protection. If you think that the United states is full of people shooting each other non-stop; first, you are wrong, second, feel free to not show up. I suppose I have rambled on long enough--hopefully communicated my point adequately.
Cheers,
Dan