Thread: Alaskan not a serious option?

  1. #1

    Question Alaskan not a serious option?

    I see no mention of the Alaskan here and was wondering why?

    That's what I was considering buying, but now am having second thoughts.

    Alan

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Calgary, AB.
    Posts
    430
    Jump over to ExpeditionCampers.com, (which is slowly being all transferd over to this site) under "General Discussion", is a write up on the Alaskan by Carlyle, who is building one up. I'm sure it time it will all be here.
    "Traveling makes one modest-you see what a tiny place you occupy in the world" Flaubert.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Spearfish SD
    Posts
    377
    Check the expeditioncampers site and there is more on Alakans. I have an early 80's model on a Dodge. They are really stout and you do not see as many old campers as an Alaskans. They are heavy for their size. I am planning on posting some pictures of my rig in the near future. - Brad

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Tucson, more or less.
    Posts
    1,996
    Alaskans are awesome campers. I have fond early memories of one belonging to a couple who took me bass fishing. But as Fisher said, they are heavy, and suited for heavy trucks. I doubt they are much, if at all, more durable than a much lighter Four-Wheel Popup with an aluminum frame, but Four-Wheel Popups haven't been around as long as Alaskans. And their popup section is fabric, where the Alaskan's is solid.
    "It is advisable to look from the tidepool to the stars and then back to the tidepool again." John Steinbeck

    1973 FJ40, 1974 Series III 88 in progress, 1982 911SC, 1970 Triumph Trophy, Thorn Nomad bicycle.

    Overland Expo


    ConserVentures

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    mtns of SoCal
    Posts
    885
    I was looking at the Alaskan also, a lot about that design appealed to me. But as others have said ... HEAVY. When I talked to the nice people there about maybe doing a custom shell, they told me 200 pounds/inch. Wow. Since I have a half-ton truck (07 Tundra) with a longbed (8 feet), it took the Alaskan out of the picture for me. Of course I could have half the bed be a front porch, but instead I decided on a flippac. Having fun with it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: weight

    Quote Originally Posted by suntinez
    When I talked to the nice people there about maybe doing a custom shell, they told me 200 pounds/inch. Wow. Since I have a half-ton truck (07 Tundra) with a longbed (8 feet), it took the Alaskan out of the picture for me.
    You must mean 20 lb/in. Their site lists an 8' cabover as 1740 lbs wet or about 18 lbs/in. The Tundra Long Bed 5.7L V8 has a maximum load capacity of 2000 lbs which is marginal but there are lighter Alaskan versions that look like they would work.

    Or maybe you meant $200/in. which is about right.
    Last edited by geodasher; 12-13-2007 at 10:51 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    mtns of SoCal
    Posts
    885
    Of course, 20 lb/inch, thanks. Interesting thought about price per inch.
    Last edited by suntinez; 12-14-2007 at 12:43 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •