So does suspension travel have any part to play in this OEM radius arm issue? If you're dealing with at most a 3" lift, and the corresponding suspension travel, will the axle with the stock radius arms really be vulnerable for mild, even somewhat technical, rock crawling?
the issue you're running into is the control arms that the RAM's come with stock. heres what they look like (this explanation also carries over for the 2005+ Ford Super Duty's as they also use radius arms. Lewis also sells these same adjustable radius arms for the 2017+ Super Duty)
So - is a totally rigid piece made of medium wall box steel. As the suspension articulates - the upper and lower mounts of the axle side are moving in different arcs. The twisting available to the axle is allowed entirely within the deflection capability of the rubber bushings and the actual twisting of the radius arm itself. because there is extremely minimal twisting capacity from the radius arm itself, enormous stressors are being placed on the axle side and frame mounts and the rubber bushing is the primary energy absorber.
here is what happens to the bushings as you keep cycling them over and over and over again offroad
here is what the Power Wagon Articulink radius arm looks like by comparison
Chrysler shrank the size of the radius arm cross section, so it itself is more capable of twisting action, and then inserted an additional rubber bushing. This link setup allows the upper mount to move semi-independently of the lower mount and massively increases available articulation. The problem still exists in the fact that you're dealing with rubber bushings that are only good for so many cycles.
The Lewis arms are connecting to the stock upper and lower rubber bushings that are pressed into the axle, but use an FK Rod-end (heim joint) to on the upper link to allow fluid motion, and on the frame side, uses a Currie 2 1/2" Johnny Joint (spherical bearing). The Johnny Joint allows for 30° + and - (60° total) movement before bind, and the FK rod end is capable of 40° + and - (80° total). Because they're spherical and designed to roll around within a race, they minimize the amount of binding within the radius link itself, and therefore massively reducing the amount of stress being placed on the bracketry and the axle itself.
here are views of a Johnny Joint and a heim joint for reference
exploded:
FK Rod end (Heim) [big ones]